Introduction to Special Relativity for a twelve year old

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of a twelve-year-old with a background in Calculus I/II and AP-level Physics learning Special Relativity (SR). Participants confirm that the mathematical requirements for SR are manageable, primarily involving basic algebra and trigonometry, while emphasizing the conceptual challenges inherent in the theory. Recommendations include reading Einstein's original 1905 paper on SR and exploring resources like "Spacetime Physics" by Taylor and Wheeler for deeper understanding. The consensus is that the child's existing knowledge is sufficient to begin studying SR effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Calculus I and II
  • AP-level Physics knowledge
  • Basic algebra and trigonometry
  • Understanding of classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Einstein's 1905 paper on Special Relativity
  • Study "Spacetime Physics" by Taylor and Wheeler
  • Explore Maxwell's theory and the Michelson-Morley experiment
  • Investigate spacetime diagrams and their applications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for young learners interested in physics, educators seeking resources for teaching relativity, and anyone aiming to grasp the fundamentals of Special Relativity before advancing to Quantum Physics or General Relativity.

  • #31
Hello!

I think that micromass may have a point. When I study from textbooks and research papers, I often make a few mistakes, and I don't even realize them until a while. (For example, I used to use one moment of inertia for all rotational mechanics problems until I figured out why I was getting many of the problems wrong). However, I think reading Einstein's original paper can work out, because I can ask my physics teacher if I don't understand something, or I am getting something wrong.

Thank You.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't know what you mean by reading 'Einstein's original paper'? Okay sure, you make a really stupid mistake by being careless of what you're reading. Does that imply that the information in the book isn't good enough for your standards?

Sure, you need to ask a few questions you're curious about, hire a tutor every 2 weeks. You think Richard Feynman asked a teacher at school about a careless mistake? NO! Because he didn't make careless mistakes, he spent years ripping his hair out throughout mathematics and physics to make sure he understood the true meaning of something, and found huge pleasure of doing so using textbooks and became one of the greatest physicists of all time. Maybe it isn't the quickest root to building a cyclotron or studying quantum mechanics, but he was brilliant at everything by the end. As I said earlier, since not everyone is Richard Feynman, hire a tutor every once and a while. I don't know the reasoning behind the doubt that textbooks 'don't work' and there is a 'BIG PROBLEM' with self studying, so I'd have to disagree with micromass.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Hello

Throughout the forums, people stated that the best way to learn special relativity is to read Einstein's original paper. So I was just saying that I will take their advice and start reading the paper. There's no harm in trying to figure out something on my own - it is fun to do anyway. Like Cbray said, if I make a mistake, I'll just take time to try and figure it out on my own. Only if I'm really stuck and I don't know what to do after lots of time spent on figuring it out, I'll ask for help. I guess I should probably stop posting on what I should do, and get around to doing it itself. :)

Thank You for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K