Introductory quantum mechanics books

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for introductory quantum mechanics books suitable for someone with a mathematics background but limited physics experience. Participants explore various texts and approaches to learning quantum mechanics, considering both formal and informal styles of presentation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests Griffiths as a good choice for an introductory quantum textbook, noting it is light but still a textbook.
  • Another participant recommends "Quantum Mechanics in Simple Matrix Form" for its focus on matrices, which they believe are essential for understanding quantum mechanics.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the need to approach quantum mechanics from multiple angles, recommending a combination of texts including Feynman Lectures, Bohm's Introductory Quantum Theory, Zetilli's QM, and Griffiths, while expressing mixed feelings about Griffiths' approach.
  • One participant advises starting with a modern physics textbook to build a foundation before tackling more advanced quantum mechanics texts, suggesting "Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers" and "A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics" by John Townsend as suitable options.
  • There is a mention of Shankar's work, with one participant seeking opinions on it, while another suggests using the forum's search feature for previous discussions on Shankar.
  • Some participants express confidence in the OP's ability to grasp linear algebra concepts due to their mathematics background, suggesting that more advanced texts like Sakurai and Dirac could be appropriate starting points.
  • One participant explicitly advises against using Gasiorowicz as a starting text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single best introductory text for quantum mechanics, with multiple competing views and recommendations presented. Some participants advocate for specific books while others express reservations or suggest alternatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the varying approaches to teaching quantum mechanics, including historical perspectives and different formulations of the subject, indicating that no single text may suffice for a comprehensive understanding.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals with a background in mathematics seeking to learn quantum mechanics, particularly those looking for book recommendations that cater to beginners or those with limited physics experience.

umc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I love reading popular sciences books during my free time, and I am particularly interested in physics. So far, I have read about Feynman, Dirac, Heisenberg, Bohr, Pauli, Oppenheimer, Randall, Steven Weinberg...in different books. The problem is that I don't have a background in physics, but I want to understand some basic stuff in quantum mechanics so that I can enjoy my reading more. I have a decent background in mathematics (bachelor's degree in math and currently working on my master's degree in math). I only had two calculus based physics courses when I was a freshman, and I don't really remember anything from my physics classes. I wonder if I can learn some basic stuff in quantum mechanics through introductory books on this subject. Is there a quantum mechanics book for laymen? I know it isn't an easy subject to digest, but I want to try since I don't really have anything to do this summer. I'd really appreciate any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For your purposes, Griffiths probably is a good choice. It's a very light quantum textbook but it is a textbook so it's not trivial.
 
There's a dover book called Quantum Mechanics in Simple Matrix Form, which you can get at amazon http://amzn.to/IBoRoD. It explains QM using spin as a motivation. This is probably the minimum amount, ie matrices, that you need to know to begin learning about QM.

Fortunately matrices aren't very difficult to grasp, and you can get another (cheap!) dover book on matrices and basic linear algebra here http://amzn.to/JmaU7b.

Alternatively OP, if you remember your calculus you could jump right into a modern physics book, such as Serway http://amzn.to/IpfCYe. I don't think it requires remembering too much from freshman physics so if you're ok with your calculus this should be just fine.
 
After finishing my first QM course, I found that there is no single answer to this question. If you want a solid understanding of the subject, you will necessarily have to approach it from different angles (read different authors). This makes sense since there are 3 different formulations of QM and, even within each one of those, authors can take different presentations. Personally, I found the following combination to work well:

- Feynman Lectures vol. 3 (great for intuition, philosophy and exposure to experiments and appications that are often omitted from other books)

- Bohm's Introductory Quantum Theory (nice historical perspective from one of the fathers of QM. He also gives a lot of philosophy, interpretation, and intuitive ideas. This books reads like a fairy tale :) )

- Zetilli's QM (great overall. It has lots of solved problems and great chapters on mathematical formulation. If you get anything at all and are serious about being fluent in QM, this is the book to get)

- Griffiths Introduction to QM (I personally have learned through hard experience to have a beef with this book. It will sweet talk you into liking it by using colloquial language. However, it often times drops bombs on intuitive understanding and the problems are insurmountable unless you have someone to help you. Luckily, due to its wide use, most grad students or professors are familiar with problems. Also, you can find most solutions online.)
 
naele said:
Fortunately matrices aren't very difficult to grasp...

The OP is doing a masters in mathematics, I suspect he wouldn't have any problems with linear algebra.
 
Seeing that you haven't had any physics other than the introductory sequence, I recommend that you pick up a modern physics textbook and get acquainted with quantum from there first. These books usually follow a more "historical" approach to QM and use basic wave mechanics; reading through something like this will set you up nicely for a full-fledged QM textbook, else you might see no motivation for it and that could kill your interest from the beginning. I used "Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Thornton and Rex while an undergrad, it's not bad.

For a more formal text, advanced undergrad level, I recommend "A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics" by John Townsend. This book is much better than Griffiths in my opinion (which I used for one semester) in that it shows wave mechanics as a only one aspect of quantum mechanics, not the fundamental core of the subject. It's a "baby" Sakurai (popular grad-level QM text) in a sense, and I've been able to follow Sakurai much better after learning from Townsend. Also, since you are a mathematics grad student, I think that the finite complex vector space/Dirac notation approach should make more sense in terms of formalism than wave mechanics as a start. You'll see all the closet group theory in this book way before a wavefunction.
 
What's everyone's thoughts on Shankar?
 
While you're waiting for a response, you might try using the forum search feature (the "Search this forum" link at the top of the list of threads) to search for "Shankar". It's been mentioned many times in previous threads here.
 
Sankaku said:
The OP is doing a masters in mathematics, I suspect he wouldn't have any problems with linear algebra.

Yes, and given that, why wouldn't Sakurai and Dirac be the best places to start?
 
  • #10
Definitely not Gasiorowicz.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K