Intuition on equipartition of energy (EM waves)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equipartition theorem, which states that in thermal equilibrium, energy is evenly distributed among all degrees of freedom in a physical system. Participants explore the application of this theorem to electromagnetic waves, questioning the intuition behind the equivalence of energy distribution in material particles and electromagnetic fields, both represented as ##1/2 k T##. The conversation highlights the formal similarities in mathematical representation, such as Poynting energy and harmonic oscillator energy, while acknowledging the fundamental differences between fields and particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the equipartition theorem in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic wave theory
  • Knowledge of Poynting's theorem and energy density in electromagnetic fields
  • Basic principles of thermal equilibrium and temperature measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the equipartition theorem on different physical systems
  • Study the relationship between temperature and energy distribution in electromagnetic fields
  • Explore Poynting's theorem in depth and its applications in thermodynamics
  • Investigate the mathematical similarities and differences between harmonic oscillators and electromagnetic waves
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the principles of energy distribution in both material and electromagnetic systems.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hi!

I try to get some intuitive understanding on the equipartition theorem stating that in thermal equilibrium, energy is evenly distributed among all degrees of freedom of a physical system.

This is indeed intuitive for a system consisting of composite particles with translational and rotational motion: each degree of freedom is just a kind of velocity, and with the randomness of thermal equilibrium it is intuitive that the energy is distributed equally among the different velocities. By reference to the ideal gass law, this amount should be ##1/2 k T##.

However, what about electromagnetic waves: it is intuitive that the energy should be distributed equally amongst the polarizations -- however, why is the energy, also here, ##1/2 kT##?

Is it intuitive that the energy associated to a degree of freedom of a material particle is the same as the energy corresponding to degree of freedom of an electromagnetic wave? I.e. ##1/2 k T##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would not call it intuitive, but it's hard to agree what does it mean. I would call it formal - Poynting energy can be written down formally in a way resembling the way harmonic oscillator's energy is written down. Physics is completely different (field vs. particle) but on a paper, the formulae look almost the same so people thought "let's try to apply the equipartition theorem to the field and see what happens".
 
Jano L. said:
I would not call it intuitive, but it's hard to agree what does it mean. I would call it formal - Poynting energy can be written down formally in a way resembling the way harmonic oscillator's energy is written down. Physics is completely different (field vs. particle) but on a paper, the formulae look almost the same so people thought "let's try to apply the equipartition theorem to the field and see what happens".

Indeed -- if it were not the case that this had to agree with the experimental notion of temerature -- i would think it was more of a definition of electromagnetic temperature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K