Invariance of schroedinger equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariance
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the Galilean invariance of the Schrödinger equation, with the user encountering an issue related to an additional term proportional to v*d/dx. They note that invariance is only achieved when applying specific transformations for space and time. The user seeks guidance on identifying the source of their mistake, as the equation does not appear invariant under Galilean transformations. A suggestion is made to modify the wavefunction by multiplying it with a space-time dependent phase factor to address the issue. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in demonstrating this invariance in quantum mechanics.
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
im trying to prove the galileo invariance of s.e. But i get stuck with an extra term prop.to v*d/dx
in fact i get invariance only for scaling x' equ. ax and t' equ. at.
Where does the mistake hide ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't do it, it isn't invariant with respect to Galilean transformations.
 
Try to change the wavefunction as well: multiply it by a space-time dependent phase factor.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
861
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K