Invariant definition of acceleration in Newtonian physics vs proper acceleration in GR

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of an invariant definition of acceleration in Newtonian physics, akin to proper acceleration in General Relativity (GR). Participants highlight that while Newtonian mechanics traditionally relies on the concept of inertial frames, Newton-Cartan gravity offers a framework where gravity is treated as a fictitious force, similar to GR. Key points include the distinction between coordinate acceleration and proper acceleration, and the assertion that Newtonian acceleration is invariant under Galilean transformations. The conversation also touches on the complexities of defining inertial motion and the implications of using accelerometers in different gravitational contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics and its limitations.
  • Familiarity with General Relativity and the equivalence principle.
  • Knowledge of Newton-Cartan gravity and its mathematical framework.
  • Concept of inertial frames and their role in defining motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of Newton-Cartan gravity.
  • Explore the implications of the equivalence principle in both GR and Newtonian contexts.
  • Learn about the differences between coordinate acceleration and proper acceleration.
  • Investigate the role of accelerometers in measuring inertial motion in various gravitational fields.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of gravity and motion in both Newtonian and relativistic frameworks.

  • #31
cianfa72 said:
So, as you pointed out in post #24, in section 2 in that paper (in particular in 2.1) a global condition on ##\tau## is actually implicitly assumed.
I don't know if it is, because I don't know if that entire section was intended to just cover standard Newtonian gravity, or whether it was intended to cover a more general category of models that all use the same general formalism.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K