Degree p Invariants in Linear Tensor Products: Bishop & Goldberg, p. 86-87

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rasalhague
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Invariant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of degree p invariants in the context of linear tensor products, specifically referencing Bishop & Goldberg's "Tensor Analysis on Manifolds." An invariant I is defined as a linear invariant of the p-fold tensor product, represented as IA = J(A ⊗ ... ⊗ A). The participants debate whether (Tr A)p, where A is a tensor of type (1,1), qualifies as a linear function of the coefficients of A ⊗ A, with the conclusion that the pth power of the trace function is homogeneous of degree p rather than linear.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor products, specifically p-fold tensor products.
  • Familiarity with the trace function in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of invariants in the context of tensor analysis.
  • Basic concepts of linear functions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the trace function in tensor analysis.
  • Explore the definitions and examples of invariants in linear algebra.
  • Research the implications of homogeneous functions versus linear functions.
  • Examine Bishop & Goldberg's "Tensor Analysis on Manifolds" for deeper insights into tensor invariants.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in tensor analysis, particularly those interested in the properties of invariants and their applications in linear algebra.

Rasalhague
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2
An Invariant I is of degree p if it is a linear invariant of the p-fold tensor product of the variable with itself, that is,

IA=J(A\otimes ...\otimes A)

- Bishop & Goldberg: Tensor Analysis on Manifolds, Dover 1980, p. 86

...

Problem 2.14.3. Show that (Tr A)p, where A is a tensor of type (1,1), in an invariant of degree p. [The fact that it is an invariant follows from the fact that Tr A is invariant. The question is whether (Tr A)2 is a linear function of the coefficients of A\otimes A etc.]

- ~ p. 87

I think I've misunderstood their definition of an invariant. The pth power of the trace function seems to be homogeneous of degree p rather than linear:

I(\lambda A) = J((\lambda A)\otimes (\lambda A)) = (\text{Tr}\, \lambda A)^2

=\lambda\lambda A^i_kA^r_m\delta^k_i\delta^m_r=\lambda\lambda A^k_kA^m_m=\lambda^2 (\text{Tr}\, A)^2= \lambda^2 IA \neq \lambda IA,

where \lambda is a scalar. (Summing over like indices.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody required ##I## to be linear. We have ##I(\lambda A) = \lambda^2 A##. However, the full definition is unfortunately missing.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
26K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K