Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

from Srednickis QFT textbook, we know the following coupling of Lorentz group representations: [tex](2,1)\otimes (2,1) = (1,1)_A \oplus (3,1)_S,[/tex] which yields [tex]\epsilon_{a b}[/tex] as an invariant symbol. Generalising, we can look at [tex](2,1)\otimes (2,1) \otimes (2,1) \otimes (2,1) = (1,1) \oplus (1,1)\oplus ...[/tex]

which implies the existence of two invariant symbols with four spinor indices. One is just the trivial coupling [tex]\epsilon_{a b}\epsilon_{c d},[/tex] but what is the other one? It should be symmetric in the first two indices, and in the last two, and (I think) be further symmetric under the exchange of the two pairs. Could someone please confirm that it is just [tex](S_L^{\mu\nu})_{a b} (S_L^{\rho\sigma})_{c d} \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}? [/tex]

(or in a different notation

[tex](\sigma^{\mu\nu})_{a b} (\sigma_{\mu\nu})_{c d}.) [/tex]

Thanks,

torus

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Invariant symbol with four spinor indices

Loading...

Similar Threads - Invariant symbol four | Date |
---|---|

A Invariance of Dirac Lagrangian | Feb 26, 2018 |

A Angular momentum operator derived from Lorentz invariance | Feb 17, 2018 |

A Any good idea how non-abelian gauge symmetries emerge? | Oct 9, 2017 |

I Time invariance of weak interaciton e-p->\nu n | Jun 26, 2017 |

I What does this symbol represent? | Feb 9, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**