Ïnverse functions and composition

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,
given two functions f and g, is there any known condition under which the following is valid:

[tex](f \circ g^{-1}) = (f^{-1} \circ g)[/tex]

Basically I have to find out the requirements for [tex]f[/tex] and [tex]g[/tex] for which composition is commutative in respect to inversion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
attempt to a solution

I probably did a step forward but I'm still stuck.
We know that: [tex](f \circ g)^{-1}=(g^{-1} \circ f^{-1})[/tex].

This obviously implies that the following must be true:
[tex](f \circ g^{-1})=(f \circ g^{-1})^{-1}=(g \circ f^{-1})[/tex]

If consider only the body in the parentheses [tex]h = f \circ g[/tex], we have the condition:

[tex]h = h^{-1}[/tex]

OK! Now, what is the family of functions that fulfills the property [tex]f = f^{-1}[/tex]?
I already found [tex]f(x)=a-x[/tex] and [tex]f(x)=a/x[/tex]
Are there others?
 
Last edited:
I just found out that a function such that [tex]f=f^{-1}[/tex] is called involution.
I also sketched out a proof which proves that the composition of two involutions is not an involution.

This would partly answer my question, implying that in order to satisfy [tex](f \circ g^{-1}) = (f^{-1} \circ g)[/tex] only one of the two function can be an involution; but still nothing useful is known about the nature of f and g

And still, what remains unanswered is: are [tex]f(x)=a-x[/tex] and [tex]f(x)=\frac{a}{x}[/tex] the only existing involutions for real functions?
 
Last edited: