Inverse/Implicit Function Theorems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frillth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on applying the Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems to a problem involving a differentiable function f: U → R^n, where U is an open subset of R^n. The conditions specify that f(0) = 0 and the derivative matrix Df(x) satisfies ||Df(x) - I|| <= s < 1 within an open ball B(0, r). The conclusion drawn is that for ||y|| < r(1-s), there exists an x in the open ball such that f(x) = y, confirming the applicability of the theorems in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Inverse Function Theorem
  • Familiarity with the Implicit Function Theorem
  • Knowledge of differentiable functions in R^n
  • Proficiency in matrix norms and properties of derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Inverse Function Theorem in detail
  • Explore the Implicit Function Theorem and its applications in multivariable calculus
  • Review the Mean Value Theorem and its implications for differentiable functions
  • Examine examples of functions satisfying ||Df(x) - I|| <= s < 1
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying advanced calculus or analysis, as well as educators and researchers focusing on differential equations and multivariable functions.

Frillth
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let B=B(0,r) be an open ball of radius r centered at the origin in R^n. Suppose U is an open subset of R^n containing the closed ball of radius r centered at the origin, f is a function from U to R^n that is differentiable, f(0) = 0, and ||Df(x) - I|| <= s < 1 for all x in the open ball. Prove that if ||y|| < r(1-s), then there is an x in the open ball such that f(x) = y.

Homework Equations



I'm pretty sure that this problem uses the inverse and implicit function theorems.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to start this problem, and I don't really have any idea what to do with the I that is being subtracted from the derivative matrix. Can somebody please get me pointed in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're probably on the right track with the implicit function theorem. I can't offer any more help than that, but in checking "Vector Calculus" (Marsden & Tromba) last night, their section on implicit function theorem looked an awful lot like your problem. The proof used the mean value theorem, which might be where your Df(x) comes into play. I'm assuming that Df(x) is the matrix of partials of fi with respect to xj.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K