Inverse Laplace Transform for F(s): Is it Possible?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of performing an inverse Laplace transform on the function F(s) = Σ[e^(ns)]/s, where n ranges from 0 to infinity. Participants are exploring the properties of this function within the context of Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the convergence of the series and its implications for the inverse Laplace transform. There are questions about expressing the function in terms of t and the applicability of known Laplace transforms.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing insights into the convergence of the series and its simplification. There is an ongoing exploration of how to express the function in terms of t, and some participants are questioning the existence of elementary Laplace transforms that match the given function.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the conditions under which the inverse Laplace transform can be applied, particularly concerning the behavior of the function as it relates to known transforms.

2RIP
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is it possible to do the inverse laplace transform for this?

F(s) = [tex]\Sigma[/tex][e^(ns)]/s where n=0 and goes to infinity


Homework Equations


u_c(t) = [e^-(cs)]/s

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't think I can use this conversion because c or s is never less than 0... So is there another method to approach this problem?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I think, the sum converges,

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{e^{ns}}{s}=\frac{-1}{(e^s-1)s}[/tex]

So it will just be

[tex]-\mathcal{L}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{1}{(e^s-1)s} \right\}[/tex]
 
Oh, so there's no way to express it in terms of t? or even express [e^ns]/s in terms of t?
 
Well when you take the inverse laplace transform, in that last equation I wrote you will get it in terms of t. I was just showing you that the sum converges so you can simplify it.

[tex]f(t)=-\mathcal{L}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{1}{(e^s-1)s} \right\}[/tex]
 
Okay, I understand that. But I don't see any elementary laplace transform which has F(s) = e^s ... All of them has a negative sign in front of the s: e^-s. So i couldn't possibly set e^s/s = u_c(t)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K