MHB Inverse of adjoint - where is my mistake ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Mistake
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I have a matrix A:

\[\begin{pmatrix} 2 &4 &1 \\ -4 &7 &3 \\ 5 &1 &-2 \end{pmatrix}\]

and I need to find the adjoint of the matrix inverse.

I found adj(A) to be:

\[\begin{pmatrix} -17 &9 &5 \\ 7 &-9 &-10 \\ -39 &18 &30 \end{pmatrix}\]

and I found the determinant of A to be -45 and the determinant of adj(A) to be 2025.

Now based on:

\[adj(A^{-1})=(adj(A))^{-1}\]

I tried solving the question, I did:

\[B=adj(A))\]

and looked for:

\[B^{-1}\]

This way:

\[B^{-1}=\frac{1}{\left | B \right |}adj(B)\]

and got:

\[\frac{1}{2025}A\]

which is not the answer. the answer should be:

\[-\frac{1}{45}A\]

And I don't understand what I did wrong here.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello all, I have a matrix A:

\[\begin{pmatrix} 2 &4 &1 \\ -4 &7 &3 \\ 5 &1 &-2 \end{pmatrix}\]

and I need to find the adjoint of the matrix inverse.

I found adj(A) to be:

\[\begin{pmatrix} -17 &9 &5 \\ 7 &-9 &-10 \\ -39 &18 &30 \end{pmatrix}\]

and I found the determinant of A to be -45 and the determinant of adj(A) to be 2025.

Now based on:

\[adj(A^{-1})=(adj(A))^{-1}\]

I tried solving the question, I did:

\[B=adj(A))\]

and looked for:

\[B^{-1}\]

This way:

\[B^{-1}=\frac{1}{\left | B \right |}adj(B)\]

and got:

\[\frac{1}{2025}A\]

which is not the answer. the answer should be:

\[-\frac{1}{45}A\]

And I don't understand what I did wrong here.

Thank you

Hi Yankel,

The inverse of $A$ is given by:
$$A^{-1}=\frac{1}{\det A} \text{adj }A$$
See adjugate matrix (as it is called with less ambiguity) on wiki.Speaking about $\det(\text{adj }A)$, it relates to $\det A$ as:
$$\det(\text{adj }A) = (\det A)^{n-1} = (-45)^{3-1} = 2025$$
 
I like Serena, thank you !

among the formulas out there I mentioned that I did find det(adj(A)) to be 2025, it was easy to miss this line.

This is not what I am asking. Taking the first formula you mentioned, I found the adj(inverse of A), and I was wrong, and can't find my mistake.
 
Yankel said:
I like Serena, thank you !

among the formulas out there I mentioned that I did find det(adj(A)) to be 2025, it was easy to miss this line.

This is not what I am asking. Taking the first formula you mentioned, I found the adj(inverse of A), and I was wrong, and can't find my mistake.

We have:
$$A^{-1} = \frac 1{\det A} \text{adj }A$$
Therefore we also have:
$$A = \frac 1{\det A^{-1}} \text{adj}(A^{-1}) \quad\Rightarrow\quad \text{adj}(A^{-1}) = \det A^{-1} \cdot A = \frac 1{\det A} \cdot A$$

Yankel said:
Now based on:

\[adj(A^{-1})=(adj(A))^{-1}\]

I tried solving the question, I did:

\[B=adj(A))\]

and looked for:

\[B^{-1}\]

This way:

\[B^{-1}=\frac{1}{\left | B \right |}adj(B)\]

Let's substitute $B=\text{adj}(A)$. That gives us:

\[B^{-1}=\frac{1}{\left | \text{adj}(A) \right |}\text{adj}(\text{adj}(A))\]

Did you evaluate $\text{adj}(\text{adj}(A))$?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K