Inverse of Matrix: Reduce Augmented Matrix [A|I] with Row Ops

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of a matrix by reducing the augmented matrix [A|I] using row operations. The subject area is linear algebra, specifically focusing on matrix operations and inverses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts various row operations but expresses difficulty in progressing towards a solution. Some participants suggest a two-stage approach to transforming the matrix, while others recommend switching rows to simplify calculations. There is a focus on making specific columns zero through targeted row operations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem. There are multiple strategies being explored, and while the original poster has made some progress, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the results achieved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions this problem is part of a series of similar questions, indicating a potential pattern or learning curve in their understanding of the material. There is also an acknowledgment of uncertainty regarding the correctness of the results obtained.

EvanQ
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the inverse of

matrixonline.jpg


by reducing the augmented matrix [A|I] using row operations.

The Attempt at a Solution



I just can't seem to get this one out, it's the last in a series of 9 similar questions and the first I am to have a hard time with.
First few attempts involved operations like:
R1 <- R1 x 1/4
R3 <- R3 + R2
R4 <- R4 + R1
R1 <- R1 - 2R4

But I don't seem to be getting any closer to a solution with the operations that i am trying.

Any help, even just a pointer as to what row operations to start off with, would be gratefully appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to use row operations to transform the left half of the augmented matrix into the identity matrix. Do this in two stages: (1) transform the left half of the augmented matrix into upper-triangular form, and (2) transform this into the identity matrix. You can do the scaling so that the diagonals are all ones as part of the first stage or at the very end.

Now split the first stage into substages. Use row operations to make the first column of rows 2-4 zero. Then make the second column of rows 3 and 4 zero. Finally, make the third column of row 4 zero.

You started fine. Your second step, R3 <- R3 + R2, is where you started to go awry.
 
I usually start these by switching row 3 with row 1, so I don't need to deal with fractions from step one (because you already have a 1 in slot 1,1). Note you can leave row 2 where it is and you already have a 1, so if you just kill the first two columns before going on to deal with columns three and four, you've already reduced the number of fractions you're dealing with by half
 
thanks a lot guys.
just got it out then, unsure of correctness, but I've gotten a result and that's at least worth part marks :p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K