Inverse trigonometric equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving an inverse trigonometric equation involving cotangent functions. The original poster presents the equation cot-1 x - cot-1 (n2 - x + 1) = cot-1 (n - 1) and attempts to manipulate it into a more solvable form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to approach the equation, including taking the tangent of both sides and simplifying the resulting expressions. There is also mention of a quadratic equation arising from the manipulation of the original equation. Some participants express confusion regarding an 'extra' term that appears in their calculations, leading to questions about the discriminant of the resulting quadratic.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations and approaches to the problem. Some have suggested alternative methods, such as taking the cotangent of both sides, while others are focused on resolving the quadratic equation and its discriminant. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the resulting expressions, with no clear consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discriminant of the quadratic equation is positive for all values of n, although it is not a perfect square in general cases, which adds to the complexity of the problem. There is also mention of specific cases, such as when n=0, where the discriminant simplifies.

utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Solve

[itex]cot^{-1} x - cot^{-1} (n^2 - x+1)=cot^-1(n-1)[/itex]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I can write the above equation as θ+α=β where the symbols represent the respective inverse functions. Now I take tan of both sides. Simplifying I get

[itex](n^2+1-2x)(n-1) = x(n^2-x+1)[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking how to solve that equation?
 
utkarshakash said:

Homework Statement


Solve

[itex]cot^{-1} x - cot^{-1} (n^2 - x+1)=cot^-1(n-1)[/itex]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I can write the above equation as θ+α=β where the symbols represent the respective inverse functions. Now I take tan of both sides. Simplifying I get

[itex](n^2+1-2x)(n-1) = x(n^2-x+1)[/itex]
I get nearly the same thing:

[itex](n^2+1-2x)(n-1) = 1+x(n^2-x+1)[/itex]
 
MrWarlock616 said:
Are you asking how to solve that equation?

Yes I have to find the value of x
 
SammyS said:
I get nearly the same thing:

[itex](n^2+1-2x)(n-1) = 1+x(n^2-x+1)[/itex]

But what should be the next step?
 
utkarshakash said:
But what should be the next step?
Multiply each side out.

Get everything to the left side.

You have a quadratic equation in x.
 
SammyS said:
Multiply each side out.

Get everything to the left side.

You have a quadratic equation in x.

But its discriminant is way too big!
 
utkarshakash said:
But its discriminant is way too big!

Too big in what sense ?

What do you get for the discriminant ?
 
SammyS said:
Too big in what sense ?

What do you get for the discriminant ?

How are you getting that 'extra' 1 in the RHS. OK I'm only posting what I got from my answer i.e. without that '1'.

D=[itex]n^4+6n^2-8n+2[/itex]
 
  • #10
utkarshakash said:
How are you getting that 'extra' 1 in the RHS. OK I'm only posting what I got from my answer i.e. without that '1'.
...]
Wow! I showed that "extra" 1 way back in post #3. Now you mention it?

I got it because,

[itex]\displaystyle \left(1+\frac{1}{x(n^2-x+1)}\right)x(n^2-x+1)=x(n^2-x+1)+1\ .[/itex]

How did you not get it?
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
Wow! I showed that "extra" 1 way back in post #3. Now you mention it?

I got it because,

[itex]\displaystyle \left(1+\frac{1}{x(n^2-x+1)}\right)x(n^2-x+1)=x(n^2-x+1)+1\ .[/itex]

How did you not get it?

Hey there is a much better solution than this. Instead of taking tan if I take cot of both sides I get a very simple result and here's it

[itex]x= \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}[/itex]

And yes you said right. There was a calculation error in my solution. It should have that extra 1
 
  • #12
utkarshakash said:
Hey there is a much better solution than this. Instead of taking tan if I take cot of both sides I get a very simple result and here's it

[itex]x= \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}[/itex]
...

That is interesting. I'll have to take a look at it.
 
  • #13
I still get a quadratic equation in x, so that can't be the solution.

[itex]\displaystyle \cot(A+B)=\frac{\cot(A)\,\cot(B)-1}{\cot(A)+\cot(B)}[/itex]
 
  • #14
SammyS said:
I still get a quadratic equation in x, so that can't be the solution.

[itex]\displaystyle \cot(A+B)=\frac{\cot(A)\,\cot(B)-1}{\cot(A)+\cot(B)}[/itex]

OMG I made the silliest mistake ever. :bugeye: Instead of taking cot of both sides I just removed the 'inverse thing' and simply calculated the value of x from there. OK sticking to my previous solution I take tan of both sides and get the same thing what you got(with that extra 1) and get the discriminant as

[itex]-4n^3+6n^2-8n+9[/itex]
 
  • #15
utkarshakash said:
OMG I made the silliest mistake ever. :bugeye: Instead of taking cot of both sides I just removed the 'inverse thing' and simply calculated the value of x from there. OK sticking to my previous solution I take tan of both sides and get the same thing what you got(with that extra 1) and get the discriminant as

[itex]-4n^3+6n^2-8n+9[/itex]
What I got for a discriminant was

[itex]n^4+6n^2-8n+9\ .[/itex]

I just rechecked it using WolframAlpha on

[itex](n^2+1-2x)(n-1) = 1+x(n^2-x+1)[/itex]

and it confirmed my result.
 
  • #16
SammyS said:
What I got for a discriminant was

[itex]n^4+6n^2-8n+9\ .[/itex]

I just rechecked it using WolframAlpha on

[itex](n^2+1-2x)(n-1) = 1+x(n^2-x+1)[/itex]

and it confirmed my result.

OK so what should I do after getting discriminant?
 
  • #17
utkarshakash said:
OK so what should I do after getting discriminant?
Nothing special. It's just a quadratic equation in x; solve it with the usual formula. If it's messy, it's messy.
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
Nothing special. It's just a quadratic equation in x; solve it with the usual formula. If it's messy, it's messy.

You can't simply say that :cry:I cannot get rid of that square root. Please help me. Its not even a perfect square. Should I leave it this way?
 
  • #19
utkarshakash said:
You can't simply say that :cry:I cannot get rid of that square root. Please help me. Its not even a perfect square. Should I leave it this way?
If n=0, then the discriminant is a perfect square. I found no other cases. Also, the discriminant is positive for all values of n.

So as haruspex said, it's a messy result.
 
  • #20
SammyS said:
If n=0, then the discriminant is a perfect square. I found no other cases. Also, the discriminant is positive for all values of n.

So as haruspex said, it's a messy result.

OK so you want me to continue with that square root.
 
  • #21
utkarshakash said:
OK so you want me to continue with that square root.

That's about all there is to do, but you can't do much simplifying.
 
  • #22
SammyS said:
That's about all there is to do, but you can't do much simplifying.

OK Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K