1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Inverse Weyl quantization of the projection operator.

  1. Mar 9, 2013 #1
    I am trying to solve the following problem on an old Quantum Mechanics exam as an exercise.

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    attachment.php?attachmentid=56531&stc=1&d=1362850754.png


    2. Relevant equations
    I know that the trace of an operator is the integral of its kernel.
    \begin{equation}
    Tr[K(x,y)] = \int K(x,x) dx
    \end{equation}



    3. The attempt at a solution
    I start out by finding the action of the operator in the trace:
    \begin{equation}
    (P_{\psi} V(-v) U(-u) \phi)(x) = \int \psi^{\star} e^{i v x} \phi(x+\hbar u) dx \psi(x)
    \end{equation}
    Which I think should, by sending $x\rightarrow y-\hbar u$, be equal to:
    \begin{equation}
    \int \psi^{\star}(y- \hbar u) e^{i v (y-\hbar u)} \phi(y) \psi(x) dy
    \end{equation}
    Which means that the integral kernel of this operator is:
    \begin{equation}
    K_{\psi}(x,y) = \psi^{\star}(y- \hbar u) e^{i v (y-\hbar u)} \psi(x)
    \end{equation}
    Which means that the trace is:
    \begin{equation}
    \int K_{\psi}(x,x) dx = \int \psi^{\star}(x- \hbar u) e^{i v (x-\hbar u)} \psi(x) dx
    \end{equation}

    So essentially I am stuck trying to solve this integral.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 9, 2013 #2

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Use this expression for the trace in the equation for ##f(q,p)## and see if you can do the ##v## integration next and then do the ##x## integration.
     
  4. Mar 9, 2013 #3
    Thanks!
    I gave that a try, and this is what I came up with:

    \begin{equation}
    f(p,q) = \frac{\hbar}{2 \pi} \int_{ℝ^{2}} \int_{ℝ} \psi^{\star}(x-\hbar u) e^{ev(x-\hbar u)} \psi(x) e^{i \hbar u v/2 -ipu -iqv/} du dv dx
    \end{equation}

    Which I think should be combined as follows so I get an expression for the dirac-delta distribution:

    \begin{equation}
    \frac{\hbar}{2 \pi} \int_{ℝ^{2}} \int_{ℝ} \psi^{\star}(x - \hbar u) \psi(x) e^{-ipu} e^{iv(-\hbar u/2 + x -q)} du dv dx
    \end{equation}

    Where the v integration gives the delta distribution:
    \begin{equation}
    f(p,q) = \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{ℝ} \int_{ℝ} \psi^{\star}(x-\hbar u) \psi(x) e^{-ipu} \delta(\frac{-\hbar u}{2} + x -q) dudx
    \end{equation}
    I figure you could do either the x or the u integration here, but since you said I should start with the x integration:
    \begin{equation}
    f(p,q) = \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{ℝ} \psi^{\star}(\frac{-\hbar u}{2} + q) \psi(\frac{\hbar u}{2} + q) e^{-ipu} du
    \end{equation}

    I don't think the last integration can be taken any further without knowing what psi is...

    As for part b, in the limit that hbar approaches zero, does this function not becomes simply identically zero?
     
  5. Mar 9, 2013 #4

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Yes, you could do the u integration before the x integration. I think you should get the same result.

    I don't think the factor of ##1/\sqrt{2\pi}## should be in the result. (Check the numerical factors in getting the delta function from the integration of the exponential.)

    Note that the probability distribution is defined as ##f(p,q)/(2\pi\hbar)##, so the ##\hbar## in front of the integral in ##f(p,q)## will disappear. You can then try to get the classical limit.
     
  6. Mar 10, 2013 #5
    Thanks again.
    I believe the current prefactor [itex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}[/itex] is still correct, but it will be taken care of once you divide by [itex]2 \pi \hbar [/itex] and compute the last integral, which is the fourier transform of [itex]|\psi|^{2}[/itex].
     
  7. Mar 10, 2013 #6

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Maybe I'm overlooking a factor of ##\sqrt{2\pi}## somewhere. When integrating over ##v## to get the dirac delta function, did you use the integral representation of the delta function as given in equation 1.17.12 here ?

    The last integral is not quite the Fourier transform of ##|\psi^2|## due to the difference in signs occurring inside the arguments of ##\psi## and ##\psi^*##.
     
  8. Mar 10, 2013 #7
    I meant it would be the fourier transform in the classical limit. And you're right about me getting that factor wrong. I misremembered there being a square root.
     
  9. Mar 10, 2013 #8

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I'm not sure about the classical limit. It seems to me that if you let h [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] 0, then the arguments of ψ and ψ* no longer depend on the integration variable u. Thus you can pull ψ and ψ* out of the integral.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Inverse Weyl quantization of the projection operator.
Loading...