I was trying to expand a three and more parameter functions similarly to the two-parameter case f(x,y)=(f(x,y)+f(y,x))/2+(f(x,y)-f(y,x))/2.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Anyway, to do the same for more parameters I need to solve

[tex]

\begin{pmatrix}

1 & 1 & 1 & \dotsb & 1\\

1 & \omega & \omega^2 & \dotsb & \omega^{n-1}\\

1 & \omega^2 & \omega^4 & \dotsb & \omega^{2(n-1)}\\

1 & \omega^3 & \omega^6 & \dotsb & \omega^{3(n-1)}\\

\vdots & &&& \vdots \\

1 & \omega^{n-1} & \omega^{2(n-1)} & \dotsb & \omega^{(n-1)(n-1)}

\end{pmatrix}\mathbf{x}=

\begin{pmatrix}

1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ \vdots \\ 0

\end{pmatrix}

[/tex]

with [itex]\omega=\exp(2\pi\mathrm{i}/n)[/itex]

Is there a closed form expression for x?

EDIT: Oh, silly me. I realized it's a discrete Fourier transform. So is this the correct way to expand then? In the 3 parameter case the solution would be

[tex]

f(x,y,z)=\frac13(f(x,y,z)+f(y,z,x)+f(z,x,y))+\frac13\left(f(x,y,z)+\omega f(y,z,x)+\omega^*f(z,x,y)\right)+\frac13\left(f(x,y,z)+\omega^*f(y,z,x)+\omega f(z,x,y)\right)[/tex]

with [itex]\omega=\exp(2\pi\mathrm{i}/3)[/itex]?

Now I'm just wondering why I get linear dependent terms when I consider the real part only?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Inversion of this Vandermonde matrix

Loading...

Similar Threads for Inversion Vandermonde matrix | Date |
---|---|

I Inverse of the sum of two matrices | Tuesday at 10:20 AM |

A Badly Scaled Problem | Apr 6, 2018 |

I Question about inverse operators differential operators | Feb 9, 2018 |

A 4th order tensor inverse and double dot product computation | May 10, 2017 |

Vandermonde Determinant, what am i doing wrong? | Jul 8, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**