Inverted garbage can and water hydrant

  • Thread starter Thread starter WannabeNewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height an inverted garbage can can achieve when suspended by water from a geyser. The initial calculations suggested a height of approximately 17 meters, based on certain assumptions about the water droplets' behavior upon impact. However, it was later clarified that the rate of water flow used in the calculations was incorrect, leading to a reevaluation of the problem. Participants noted that as the water jet rises, it loses kinetic energy, which affects the maximum height achievable. Ultimately, the correct approach involves adjusting the parameters to account for this energy loss and ensuring the flow rate is accurately represented.
WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552

Homework Statement


An inverted garbage can of weight W is suspended in air by water from a geyser. The water shoots up at a constant rate \frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t} with velocity v_{0}. What is the maximum height at which the garbage can rides? The upwards direction is positive. Answer clue: if v_{0} = 20\frac{m}{s}, W = 98.1N, \frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t} = .5\frac{kg}{s} then h_{max} \approx 17m.

The Attempt at a Solution


The net force on the garbage can is F = F_{I} - W where F_{I} is the impact force due to the stream of water. Consider a small amount of the stream of droplets, \Delta m that, at time t = t_{0}, is just about to hit the can. We have that P_{0} = v_{0}\Delta m and at t_{0} + \Delta t, the time instantly after the rebound\reflection of the small amount of droplets, P_{f} = -v_{0}\Delta m so \frac{\Delta P}{\Delta t} = \frac{-v_{0}\Delta m - v_{0}\Delta m}{\Delta t} = \frac{-2v_{0}\Delta m}{\Delta t}. Therefore, \lim_{t \rightarrow 0}\frac{\Delta P}{\Delta t} = \frac{\mathrm{d} P}{\mathrm{d} t} = -2v_{0}\frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t} = F_{I} thus \frac{W}{g}a = -(W + 2v_{0}\frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t}) so a = \frac{-(W + 2v_{0}\frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t})}{\frac{W}{g}}. At the maximum height, the can is instantaneously at rest so v_{0}^{2} = -2ah_{max}. Then, h_{max} = \frac{Wv_{0}^{2}}{2g(W + 2v_{0}\frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t})}. Now if I plug in the parameters from the answer clue then I do indeed get h_{max} \approx 17m (16.93480102m to be exact when using g = 9.81m\s^2). My only problem is I had to use a major assumption when arriving at this solution: the water droplets would be rebounded\reflected perfectly so that the velocity of the small amount of droplets instantly after the rebound would be the same as the velocity instantly before hitting the can. If I drop this assumption then I really can't conceive of any way to find the new velocity using only the given information since I won't know how much of the velocity was lost to the can upon impact. If I keep the assumption, I can't exactly convince myself physically why the assumption is true. Any help would be appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given the velocity of the water, is that the velocity at ground level? If so as the water jet rises it will lose velocity, have you taken that into account? Your assumption that the garbage can "reflects" the water with no lose in velocity is OK I think.
 
The hydrant pumps out a constant steady jet of water at that velocity for all time so I think we can say the jet of water doesn't lose velocity as it rises.
 
WannabeNewton said:
The hydrant pumps out a constant steady jet of water at that velocity for all time so I think we can say the jet of water doesn't lose velocity as it rises.

Any jet of water can only rise so high.

Max height ≈ v^2/2g if shot straight up.

As a water jet rises in our gravitational field it loses kinetic energy.

Maybe others can help?
 
Spinnor said:
Any jet of water can only rise so high.

Max height ≈ v^2/2g if shot straight up.

As a water jet rises in our gravitational field it loses kinetic energy.

Maybe others can help?

Yeah I forgot that the droplets do indeed lose velocity as they go up as you stated. I can re-work the problem. Weird that the answer clue worked out for this solution though. Thanks again.
 
Hey Spinnor, I figured out the solution and there wasn't much to change. I did find out that Kleppner had a mistake in his answer clue for this problem however which is why the answer came out right for the incorrect solution above haha! In the answer clue, dm \ dt should be 6kg\s not .5kg\s which incidentally wouldn't even be enough to raise the garbage can of that weight up that high (17 meters). So anyways I just did v^{2} = v_{0}^{2} - 2gy for the trajectory of the water droplets. Then, v_{h} = (v_{0}^{2} - 2gh_{max})^{\frac{1}{2}} so, keeping the same procedure for finding the impact force as before but using v_{h}, \frac{\mathrm{d} P}{\mathrm{d} t} = 2(v_{0}^{2} - 2gh_{max})^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t} = W at the max height so h_{max} = \frac{1}{2g}(v_{0}^{2} - (\frac{W}{2\frac{\mathrm{d} m}{\mathrm{d} t}})^{2}).
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
581
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
14K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K