Inverting parabolic and stereographic coordinates

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
Epimetheus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the parabolic co-ordinate system defined, given Cartesian coordinates x and y, as
[tex]$\mu=2xy$[/tex]
[tex]$\lambda = x^2-y^2,$[/tex]
find the inverse transformation [tex]x(\mu, \lambda)[/tex] and [tex]y(\mu,\lambda)[/tex].

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



We compute [tex]\lambda/\mu^2[/tex] in order to obtain
[tex]x=\pm \sqrt{\frac{\lambda\pm\sqrt{\lambda^2+1}}2}[/tex]
and
[tex]y=\frac{2\mu}{\pm \sqrt{\frac{\lambda\pm\sqrt{\lambda^2+1}}2}}[/tex]

However, I don't think this is right ... I'm following a set of CM lecture notes, which immediately go on to claim [tex]x^2+y^2=\lambda^2+\mu^2[/tex] and
[tex]\dot x^2 + \dot y^2 = \frac14 \frac{\dot \lambda^2 + \dot \mu^2}{\sqrt{\lambda^2 + \mu^2}}[/tex]
which looks tantalizingly similar to spherical polars, but doesn't seem to follow from what I have ...

Any thoughts on inverting general "nonlinear" co-ordinate systems (other than cylindrical and spherical)? What about finding the inverse transformation for the stereographic projection defined by
[tex]\frac{x}{\xi} = \frac{y}{\eta} = \frac1{1-\zeta}[/tex]

so that [tex]x=\frac{\xi}{1-\zeta}; y=\frac{\eta}{1-\zeta}[/tex]?

It's hard to get rid of the "old" set of variables in this case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to find x and y in terms of [tex]\lambda[/tex] and [tex]\mu[/tex], then youre given [tex]\mu=2xy[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{\mu}{2x}[/tex].

Substitute this in the other equation and solve for x. Similarly for y.
 
Last edited: