B Investigating the Impact of Chips on Packaging Pressure Differential

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of packaging contents, specifically chips, on the pressure differential experienced during sealing at different altitudes. The experiment involves testing a cardboard can's ability to withstand external pressure at sea level compared to 1800 meters. One viewpoint suggests that the presence of chips reduces the internal air volume, potentially affecting the pressure dynamics, while the opposing view argues that external pressure remains constant regardless of internal air volume. Key considerations include the effectiveness of the lid seal and the potential for inward air flow that could introduce contaminants. Ultimately, the design of the packaging and its ability to manage pressure differentials is crucial for maintaining product integrity.
Danfishman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I hope this is the right area to post this question. We are having a debate at my workplace and was hoping there was someone more qualified to settle the debate.

We are a packaging company and have setup an experiment to test the pressure differnential from sealiong at 1800m vs. Sea Level. We would like to see if the packaging can with stand the external pressure at sea level. We have calculated this diffence to roughly .2 bar (~3PSI), set up an experiment by placing the sealed packs in pressure chamber, and add the 3psi of air to the tank.

The debate came about as to wether adding chips (the product) would effect the result. Ie decreasing the amount of air (chips are displacing the air) would help offset the external air pressure being applied.

One side is saying that the smaller volume of air will result in less external pressure as there is less air trying to equalise. The otherside believes it makes no difference, as the pressure is being applied externally and the amount of air is inside makes no difference, as long it is at the same pressure in both instances.

Would having chips in the packaging affect the result?

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome, @Danfishman !

Could you describe the package?
 
Sure,

It is a cardboard/ paperboard can, like a pringles can.
 
Danfishman said:
One side is saying that the smaller volume of air will result in less external pressure as there is less air trying to equalise

That argument doesn't make sense.
The external pressure is established by the elevation.
 
Danfishman said:
It is a cardboard/ paperboard can, like a pringles can.
If the lid is clipped on, the can will probably breathe out when taken to a higher altitude, where the external air pressure will be less. If taken to a lower altitude, the increased pressure may seal the lid and so provide a positive external pressure.

I expect the aim should be to avoid the inward flow of air that could introduce spores or contaminants to the product.

The details of the lid seal will be critical to determining the pressure differential during transport.
 
  • Like
Likes Tutoroot and Lnewqban
A breather, coupled to an internal balloon with a volume big enough to absorb the pressure differential will avoid stressing the package (that's one extreme). A rigid (like a submarine) package will maintain the internal pressure whatever your altitude. Which do you actually need?
My coffee packs have a breather valve which works one way, to let air out at altitude and the pack is always a bit wrinkled when the aircraft lands. This pack gives no physical protection to excess pressure (the coffee beans don't care) but avoids contaminated air entry.
 
Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to. Greenhouse gasses both warm and cool the atmosphere by slowing heat loss to space. But what would happen without GHGs? I read that the earth would be colder (though still relatively warm), but why? Without GHGs the atmosphere would still be a similar mass and still warmed by conduction from the surface, yet without a means to radiate that heat to space. Why wouldn't the atmosphere accumulate heat over time, becoming warmer? How...