How does scintigraphy detect gamma photons from Iodine-131 disintegration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter duchuy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the detection of gamma photons emitted during the decay of Iodine-131 (I-131) in scintigraphy. Participants clarify that while I-131 decays into an excited Xenon-131 (Xe*), it is the excited Xe nucleus that emits gamma photons, not the I-131 itself. The equation commonly used to represent this decay simplifies the process by attributing gamma emission to I-131, which can lead to misunderstandings. Proper understanding of the decay scheme and the role of excited states is essential for accurate interpretation in scintigraphy applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear decay processes, specifically Iodine-131 decay.
  • Familiarity with gamma and beta radiation types.
  • Knowledge of scintigraphy and its applications in medical imaging.
  • Basic grasp of atomic structure and isotopes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the decay scheme for I-131 to understand the transition to excited states.
  • Study the principles of scintigraphy and how gamma photons are detected.
  • Learn about the differences between gamma and X-ray emissions in nuclear decay.
  • Examine the design and functionality of scintillation detectors used in medical imaging.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for medical physicists, radiologists, and students in nuclear medicine who seek to deepen their understanding of gamma photon detection and the nuances of I-131 decay in scintigraphy.

duchuy
Messages
79
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Determine the emmited particle
Relevant Equations
I --> Xe* + e- + ν_
Hi,
I'm struggling to understand an answer in my MCQ.
It states that a scintigraphy would detect γ photons emitted by the iodine's nucleus, and the answer was correct.
But I don't understand how it would detect γ photons from the iodine's nucleus since it disintegrates by forming Xe*, an electron and an antineutrino. So even if it is caused by an electronic rearrangement due to the appearance of a new electron, it would emit a X photon.
To a certain extent, we could say that excited Xe nucleus would emit γ photons but I really don't understand how the iodine's nucleus could emit γ photons...
Can someone please explain to me thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
duchuy said:
Homework Statement:: Determine the emmited particle
Relevant Equations:: I --> Xe* + e- + ν_

Hi,
I'm struggling to understand an answer in my MCQ.
It states that a scintigraphy would detect γ photons emitted by the iodine's nucleus, and the answer was correct.
But I don't understand how it would detect γ photons from the iodine's nucleus since it disintegrates by forming Xe*, an electron and an antineutrino. So even if it is caused by an electronic rearrangement due to the appearance of a new electron, it would emit a X photon.
To a certain extent, we could say that excited Xe nucleus would emit γ photons but I really don't understand how the iodine's nucleus could emit γ photons...
Can someone please explain to me thank you!
Your equation is missing mass (and atomic) numbers. Knowing which isotopes are involved is essential. And your antineutrino symbol should have a bar over it.

However, I guess you are talking about I-131. Look-up the 'decay scheme for I-131' and you will see a mix of ##\beta## and ##\gamma## radiation is produced.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: duchuy
Steve4Physics said:
Your equation is missing mass (and atomic) numbers. Knowing which isotopes are involved is essential. And your antineutrino symbol should have a bar over it.

However, I guess you are talking about I-131. Look-up the 'decay scheme for I-131' and you will see a mix of ##\beta## and ##\gamma## radiation is produced.
Yes, sorry, I am talking about I-131. But I don't understand how the gamma photon is produced and I can't seem to find an explanation for the origin of the gamma photon emitted by I-131's nucleus. I see how gamma radiation is produced by the excited Xe nucleus, but not by iodine's.
 
duchuy said:
Yes, sorry, I am talking about I-131. But I don't understand how the gamma photon is produced and I can't seem to find an explanation for the origin of the gamma photon emitted by I-131's nucleus. I see how gamma radiation is produced by the excited Xe nucleus, but not by iodine's.
EDITED - sorry, I re-read the question and have changed my answer...

I think the statement:
"scintigraphy would detect γ photons emitted by the iodine's nucleus"
is an oversimplification to avoid describing the excited states of Xe.

The gamma photons are emitted by the excited Xe nuclei.
 
Last edited:
Steve4Physics said:
EDITED - sorry, I re-read the question and have changed my answer...

I think the statement:
"scintigraphy would detect γ photons emitted by the iodine's nucleus"
is an oversimplification to avoid describing the excited states of Xe.

The gamma photons are emitted by the excited Xe nuclei.
What's happening in the diagram is actually what's troubling me. Iodine's nuclei decays into an excited xenon atom. The excited xenom atom emits gamma photons to attain a lower and stable energy state by emitting gamma photons. Therefore the nuclei that emits gamma photons is the excited xenon's, not I-131, right?
From what I understand, I-131's nuclei decays by transmutating a neutron into a neutron, electron and antineutrino to attain a lower energy state due to its neutron excess, it doesn't emit gamma photons.
 
duchuy said:
What's happening in the diagram is actually what's troubling me. Iodine's nuclei decays into an excited xenon atom. The excited xenom atom emits gamma photons to attain a lower and stable energy state by emitting gamma photons. Therefore the nuclei that emits gamma photons is the excited xenon's, not I-131, right?
From what I understand, I-131's nuclei decays by transmutating a neutron into a neutron, electron and antineutrino to attain a lower energy state due to its neutron excess, it doesn't emit gamma photons.
I agree. (I don't know if you read my updated post #4.)

It is quite common to attribute the gamma photon to decay of I-131 and write an equation such as
##^{131}_{53}I → ^{131}_{54}Xe + \beta^- + \gamma + \overline {\nu_e}##

This ignores the (intermediate) excited state of Xe for convenience/simplicity. Many years ago I taught physics to radiography students. The equation they used would have been
##^{131}_{53}I → ^{131}_{54}Xe + \beta^- + \gamma##

So the level of detail depends on the context. The original question was not rigorously stated.
 
Steve4Physics said:
I agree. (I don't know if you read my updated post #4.)

It is quite common to attribute the gamma photon to decay of I-131 and write an equation such as
##^{131}_{53}I → ^{131}_{54}Xe + \beta^- + \gamma + \overline {\nu_e}##

This ignores the (intermediate) excited state of Xe for convenience/simplicity. Many years ago I taught physics to radiography students. The equation they used would have been
##^{131}_{53}I → ^{131}_{54}Xe + \beta^- + \gamma##

So the level of detail depends on the context. The original question was not rigorously stated.
Ok I see thank you so much for your help. So in case where I'm using I-131 to detect hyperthyroidism by scintigraphy, the sensors should surround the patient completely because gamma photons are emitted in all directions right? And again, sincerely, thank you sir!
 
duchuy said:
Ok I see thank you so much for your help. So in case where I'm using I-131 to detect hyperthyroidism by scintigraphy, the sensors should surround the patient completely because gamma photons are emitted in all directions right? And again, sincerely, thank you sir!
There is no reason that 'the sensors should surround the patient completely'. A well designed system is sensitive enough to only require a few percent of the photons to be collected.

We had a setup specifically for thyroid measurements (hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism and ca). It consisted of two detectors (each being a scintillator + PM). Both were pointed to the thyroid - one at the front of the patient's neck and one at the back of the neck. This had the advantage of reducing errors due to patient positioning because the combined response curve was quite 'flat' in the region between the detectors.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: duchuy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K