Undergrad Irreducible Representations of EM-Tensor Under Spatial Rotations

PreposterousUniverse
Messages
31
Reaction score
4
Can we consider the E and B fields as being irreducible representations under the rotations group SO(3) even though they are part of the same (0,2) tensor? Of course under boosts they transform into each other are not irreducible under this action. I would like to know if there is in some way one could decompose the electromagnetic tensor F into the E and B under spatial rotations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## are vector fields in the sense of the usual rotation group SO(3). Each provides an irreducible representation of this group, because there's not proper subspace that stays invariant under the action of the group.

I'm not sure what you mean bye "decompose the electromagnetic tensor F into the E and B under spatial rotations". Maybe the most simple answer is to use the representation for the full proper orthochronous Lorentz group in terms of ##\mathrm{SO}(3,\mathbb{C})##. This is how the Riemann-Silberstein vector ##\vec{F}=\mathrm{E}+\mathrm{i} \vec{B}## transforms under proper orthochronous Lorentz transformations. The usual rotations are of course represented by the subgroup SO(3) of ##\mathrm{SO}(3,\mathbb{C})##. This means of course that ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## transform within each other by rotations. A pure rotation-free boost along a given direction is represented by the usual rotation matrix but with an purely imaginary angle, i.e., a boost always mixes electric and magnetic field components.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K