Is 0 divided by 0 equal to any number?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MC363A
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concept of dividing zero by zero (0/0) and the equality of the repeating decimal 0.999... to the number 1. Participants explore various arguments, proofs, and counterarguments related to these topics, touching on foundational aspects of mathematics, including division by zero and the representation of repeating decimals.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that since 0 times any number equals zero, dividing zero by zero could yield any number.
  • Others argue that dividing by zero is not valid and question the legitimacy of manipulating equations that involve division by zero.
  • A participant presents a sequence to illustrate that 0.999... approaches 1 as the number of decimal places increases, suggesting they are equal.
  • Some participants provide algebraic manipulations to show that repeating decimals can be expressed as fractions, specifically that 0.999... equals 1.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of proofs that rely on dividing by zero or assume what they aim to prove.
  • Several participants challenge the assertion that all repeating decimals can be expressed as fractions, asking for proofs and examples.
  • There are claims that any repeating decimal can be represented as a fraction with a denominator consisting of 9's, but this is met with skepticism and calls for clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the validity of dividing zero by zero and the equality of 0.999... and 1. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of their arguments, particularly regarding the assumptions made when dividing by zero and the need for rigorous proofs when discussing properties of repeating decimals.

  • #91
the subject heading "nope" was in response to "all mathematical ideas have been aptly addressed concerning this phenomenon of .9repeating=1...".

I must have gotten lost navigating the messege board.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #92
The difference between .9repeated and 1 is the diameter of a point... :) can you argue with that?
 
  • #93
Also, when calculating something that involves .999999...you use 1, then apply the appropriate thing to the end. I know that sounds really dumb, but if you were to say "What's n*0.9999" you would just use 1, and say "infinitely close to n" or soemthing liek that.
 
  • #94
What a lovely thread to come home to after a miserable day.

(a) Don't hijack threads.
(b) Don't insult people.

The discussion seems to have moved to a new thread, so I'm locking this one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
927
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K