Is (a+b+c)2>0 the correct approach for proving a2+b2+c2>ab+bc+ca?

  • Thread starter Thread starter azizlwl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving inequalities involving real numbers, specifically the relationships a² + b² + c² > ab + bc + ca and a/b + b/a > 2. Participants explore various approaches and reasoning related to these inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the expression (a+b+c)² > 0 to derive inequalities but questions the validity of this approach. Other participants suggest alternative methods and emphasize the importance of starting with given truths to derive conclusions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing insights and alternative methods. Some express confusion and seek clarification on the approaches being discussed. There is a recognition of multiple ways to tackle the inequalities, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, such as the requirement that a, b, and c are distinct real numbers and the implications of positivity in the second inequality. There is also mention of forum rules regarding the nature of assistance provided.

azizlwl
Messages
1,066
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement



a. Prove: If a≠b≠c are real numbers, then a2+b2+c2>ab+bc+ca
b. Prove: If a>0, b>0and a≠b, then a/b+b/a>2

Homework Equations


(real numbers)2>0


The Attempt at a Solution


a.
(a+b+c)2>0
a2+b2+c2>-2(ab+bc+ca)
Try to prove -2(ab+bc+ca) > ab+bc+ca but not true, -2.4 <4


Must be wrong approach?

b.
Same approach with same result.
a/b+b/a>0
Since a>0, b>0 =>ab>0
(a+b)2/(ab)>2

Freeze...no idea
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mod note: Removed quoted work.[/color]
Hello, Ahmed you're not supposed to give people the answer to the problem. You have to 'help them solve'. And by the way the first one you can do a proof by contradiction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, I'm so sorry, I am new to the forum and have only skimmed over the rules. Thank you for notifying me, I will read the entire forum rules so I don't make such mistakes again.
 
Ali said:
Oh, I'm so sorry, I am new to the forum and have only skimmed over the rules. Thank you for notifying me, I will read the entire forum rules so I don't make such mistakes again.

Ok not a problem.
 
Thank you Mr. Ali Ahmed.
I've racking my brain(old man's brain) to max. to find solution.
 
Lessons learned from Mr Ali.

1.
(a±b)>0 wrong
instead
(a±b)≥0

2. Many ways of getting a2, ab, b2...
My only way (a+b+c)2
but there are other ways
(a-b)2, (b-c)2,(c-a)2...

from lessons learn, now i can solve 3rd problems

3. Prove: If a2 + b2=1 and c2 + d2=1,
then, ac + bd ≤ 1

Way of getting ac, (a-c)2 ≥ 0
bd, (b-d)2 ≥ 0

a2+c2-2ac ≥0
b2+d2-2bd ≥0

a2+c2 +b2+d2 -2(ac+bd)≥0

-2(ac+bd)≥-2
Changing sense of equalityThus, ac+bd ≤ 1
 
Last edited:
Exactly azizlwl.

The main problem in math proofs is that you sort of have to trick the solution into appearing (which is usually not obvious). But maybe for future reference, if you ever encounter such problems again, the way I start is by coming up with ways of getting what I want (necessary terms, number, etc.) in the equation and then reduce the equation to its simplest form.

What might often happen is that the reduction turns out to be useless, so when I reach such a point in my derivation I disregard my last method of obtaining my necessary terms, and use a new one (if you are confident that you made no mistake in the reduction and you arrive at a useless conclusion, then start fresh).

But I understand where your coming from, I often go crazy even trying to solve the simplest problems.
 
Here difference way done by Dr. Mark.
a/b+b/a>2
Since both a and b are positive, multiply through by ab
a^2+b^2>0
a^2-2ab+b^2>0
(a-b)^2>

Then i asked him what is the difference and which is easier.
Here his answer


"Typically you start with what is given and derive a truth, but if you can start with the truth and derive what is given, then that is valid as well. Usually it is easier the first way, because you may not know what to begin with the second way."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K