matt grime said:
And what properties would this 'assignment of values' have? I suspect it might necessarily be a measure for it to have the nice properties of integration that you want.
I was originally thinking of something like:
If [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]B[/itex] are valued sets then
If [itex]A \subset B[/itex] then [itex]A[/itex]'s complement in [itex]B[/itex] is also valued.
If [itex]A \cap B = \null[/itex] then [itex]V(A)+V(B)=V(A \union B)[/itex].
And, [itex]V(A)\geq 0[/itex].
This is not necessarily a measure since it is not necessarily an algebra.
But it's not that difficult to hack up an abstract notion of 'integral' that doesn't even require that:
Let's say I have some set [itex]X[/itex], with [itex]M \subset P(X)[/itex] and some
function [itex]V:M \rightarrow R[/itex], where [tex]R[/tex] is a linearly ordered complete ring.
Then let [itex]\mathbb{P}[/itex] be the set of all finite partitions of [itex]X[/itex] that are subsets of [itex]M[/itex] and that do not contain the empty set.
Now, let [itex]P \in \mathbb{P}[/itex] be some partition of [itex]X[/itex] that is a subset of [itex]M[/itex]. Then (for lack of a better term) let the top of [itex]P[/tex] be <br />
[tex]\rm{top}(P)=\sum_{p \in P} V( p) \times \rm{max}(f(p))[/tex]<br />
where [itex]\rm{max}(f(p))[/itex] is the supremum of the image of [itex]p[/itex] in [itex]f[/itex].<br />
And, let the bottom of [itex]P[/itex] be<br />
[tex]\rm{bottom}(P)=\sum_{p \in P} V(p) \times \rm{min}(f(p))[/tex]<br />
where [itex]\rm{min}(f(p))[/itex] is the infimum of the image of [itex]p[/itex] in [itex]f[/itex].<br />
Then if [tex]\rm{sup}\{p \in \mathbb{P}, \rm{bottom}(P)\}=\rm{inf}\{p \in \mathbb{P}, \rm{top}(P)\}[/tex], let's say that [itex]\rm{sup}\{p \in \mathbb{P}, \rm{bottom}(P)\}[/itex] is the 'integral' of [itex]f[/itex] on [itex]X[/itex] and otherwise that [itex]f[/itex] is not 'integrable' on [itex]X[/itex].[/itex]