The discussion centers around the necessity of a national emergency declaration for swine flu, exploring the implications of such a declaration, the current state of the outbreak, and differing perspectives on the severity of the situation. Participants reference data on flu activity, hospitalizations, and public reactions to the outbreak.
Participants express a range of views on the necessity of the emergency declaration, with some supporting it based on rising flu activity and others questioning its necessity and suggesting it may be an overreaction. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the outbreak's severity and public response.
Participants reference various data sources and personal experiences, highlighting limitations in the information available and the potential for differing interpretations of flu activity and public health responses.
It wasn't a claim, did you see the link I provided to the CDC? They are the ones that say that the reports are skewed by the new testing.Sorry! said:I used statistics given by the government and provided a link to them Evo claimed that this proves nothing because of testing methods
Increased Testing
CDC has developed a PCR diagnostic test kit to detect this novel H1N1 virus and has now distributed test kits to all states in the U.S. and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The test kits are being shipped internationally as well. This will allow states and other countries to test for this new virus. This increase in testing will likely result in an increase in the number of confirmed cases of illness reported. This, combined with ongoing monitoring through Flu View should provide a fuller picture of the burden of disease in the United States over time.
Evo said:It wasn't a claim, did you see the link I provided to the CDC? They are the ones that say that the reports are skewed by the new testing.
http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/updates/050809.htm
Evo said:It wasn't a claim, did you see the link I provided to the CDC? They are the ones that say that the reports are skewed by the new testing.
Thursday Oct 22, 2009
(NBC) - Latest numbers from the CDC show one in five children had symptoms of the flu so far in October. According to researchers, these children likely are showing symptoms of swine flu.
Update, Friday Oct. 23: Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, director of the CDC, said Friday in a news conference that the data was misinterpreted by news media and that it is highly unlikely that most of the cases were swine flu.
OmCheeto said:And skewed by the press:
And picked up and rebroadcast by scores of news stations:
Google results 1 - 10 of about 1,720 for "one in five kids had swine flu".
turbo-1 said:In that outbreak, armories and other public buildings all across the state were opened, and the inoculations were given via the pneumatic guns that the military uses. Much faster than using needles.
Sorry! said:I highly doubt Obama makes his decisions based on media misrepresentation or by googling things... (wasn't it McCain who did that?)
http://www.flu.gov/professional/federal/h1n1emergency10242009.html
Past instances where authority to grant Section 1135 waivers was enabled for recent disaster events include
* Hurricane Katrina (2005)
* 56th Presidential Inauguration (2009)
* Hurricanes Ike and Gustav (2008)
* North Dakota flooding (2009)
Are you serious? I think you need to come out of left field, where on Earth are you coming up with these accusations? You are being warned, this kind of behavior is not allowed here.Sorry! said:Yes I did see the link you posted as well as the bolded parts. No I do not think that you providing this as support will substantiate your claim that THATS what's happening. They are making a CLAIM too and your basing your own claim off their original claim. I'm using solid numbers based on observational evidence and numerical data that's been collected which ADMITS to skewed results surrounding new testing methods but since then (a few months ago) the methods for reporting to the numerical data has been pretty much normilized...
The question is did you read the entire report that I posted or are you just dead sure that what you think is 100% correct and the rest of the people that goes against you are crazy, unintelligent, are just trying to start a panic, or are just trying to make money and none of it has any backing what-so-ever.
Evo said:Are you serious? I think you need to come out of left field, where on Earth are you coming up with these accusations? You are being warned, this kind of behavior is not allowed here.
Making false and unsubstantiated accusations and claims is not allowable.Sorry! said:So me directing a question to you is not allowable behaviour. Good to know.
Virtuous said:I live in Hamilton...and...I don't see the zombies yet. I know people who have had it, and they are over it, and I've been around them, and got nothing. I think the panic is over-hyped. This won't be the first or last strain of the flu that will mutate, it's as close to inevitable as possible. How many times have we heard about it in previous years? Call me when 90% of the world population has died off, then I'll panic ( or maybe a bit before that ;] ).
I'm not the only one either, read the thread. Read the other threads about the flu and not wanting to get vaccines because they don't consider this season to be of concern. It seems I am more concerned than others.Sorry! said:I'm not saying that it should cause a panic but Evo is saying that it isn't true that this years flu season is worse.
I won't, because I would have to be in a public place where the risk of adverse reaction to fragrance chemicals would be much higher than the possible risk of getting the flu. Flu might make me feel bad for a few days - fragrance chemicals could kill me, put me in the ER/intensive care for days, and still make me feel really bad for a few days.B. Elliott said:If it's available, I just can't see why anyone wouldn't be inclined to get vaccinated.
B. Elliott said:If it's available, I just can't see why anyone wouldn't be inclined to get vaccinated.