Is A Self-Adjoint in Wave Mechanics?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 3K views
noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two operators , A and B , satisfy the equations

[tex]A=B^{\dagger}B+3 and A= BB^{\dagger}+1[/tex]

a)Show that A is self adjoint
b)Find the commutator of [tex][B^{\dagger},B][/tex]
c) Find the commutator of [tex][B,B^{\dagger}][/tex]
d) Suppose [tex]\varphi[/tex] is an eigenfunction of A with eigenvalue a:

A[tex]\varphi[/tex]=a[tex]\varphi[/tex]

show that if B[tex]\varphi[/tex] =/ 0 then B[tex]\varphi[/tex] is an eigenfunction of A , and find the eigenvalue.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've only worked on the first part of the problem. I will address the remaining 3 parts later.

[tex](A)^{\dagger}=(B^{\dagger}B+3)^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}(B^{\dagger})^{\dagger}+(3)^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}B+(3)^{\dagger}[/tex]. 3 is not an operator so I don't think you can take the adjoint of it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
noblegas said:
[tex]A=B^{\dagger}B+3\text{ and }A= BB^{\dagger}+1[/tex]


[tex](A)^{\dagger}=(B^{\dagger}B+3)^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}(B^{\dagger})^{\dagger}+(3)^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}B+(3)^{\dagger}[/tex]. 3 is not an operator so I don't think you can take the adjoint of it.

Hi noblegas! :smile:

(LaTeX doesn't take any notice of spaces unless you put them inside \text{} :wink:)

I assume they mean 3 times the identity, I.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi noblegas! :smile:

(LaTeX doesn't take any notice of spaces unless you put them inside \text{} :wink:)

I assume they mean 3 times the identity, I.


okak then [tex]B^{\dagger}B+(3I)^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}B+3*I^{\dagger}=B^{\dagger}B+3*I=[/tex]

Therefore [tex]A^{\dagger}=A[/tex]? Now proceeding to the next two parts of the problem;

b) [tex][B,B^{\dagger}]=BB^{\dagger}-B^{\dagger}B[/tex]

[tex]BB^{\dagger}=A-1, B^{\dagger}B=A-3[/tex], therefore

[tex][B,B^{\dagger}]=BB^{\dagger}-B^{\dagger}B=A-1-(A-3)=A-1*I-(A-3*I)=2I[/tex]

c)[tex][A,B]=AB-BA=(BB^{\dagger}+1)B-B(BB^{\dagger}+1)=BB^{\dagger}B+B-BBB^{\dagger}-B=BB^{\dagger}B-BBB^{\dagger}=B(BB^{\dagger}-BB^{\dagger})=B(2I)=2BI[/tex]
 
tiny-tim said:
You seem to have changed the questions :rolleyes:

but it looks ok :smile:

what do you mean? I was writing out my solutions for part b and c of my question; how should I start part d of the problem? Should I start by assuming that [tex]A<br /> * \varphi=a*\varphi=>A*\varphi-a*\varphi=0[/tex]? See my OP
 
Last edited:
Hi noblegas! :smile:

(have a phi: φ and a dagger: † :wink:)
noblegas said:
what do you mean?
I meant …
noblegas said:
b)Find the commutator of [tex][B^{\dagger},B][/tex]
c) Find the commutator of [tex][B,B^{\dagger}][/tex]
noblegas said:
b) [tex][B,B^{\dagger}]=\cdots[/tex]

c)[tex][A,B]=\cdots[/tex]

For d), remember that when the examiner sets you a series of questions, the last one usually comes very easily from the preceding ones …

in this case, just use c) :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi noblegas! :smile:

(have a phi: φ and a dagger: † :wink:)

I meant …



For d), remember that when the examiner sets you a series of questions, the last one usually comes very easily from the preceding ones …

in this case, just use c) :smile:


oh I see then . [tex][B^{\dagger},B]=-2*I, and [A,B]=-2BI[/tex] correct?
 
did you not understand my latest solution
 
stuck on part d again: AB-BA=-2BI, ARe they saying [tex]B\varphi[/tex]=> 2BI [tex]\neq[/tex] 0
 
Last edited:
noblegas said:
stuck on part d again: AB-BA=-2BI, ARe they saying [tex]B\varphi[/tex]=> 2BI [tex]\neq[/tex] 0

(what happened to that φ i gave you? :confused:)

Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking. :redface:

An eigenvector cannot be zero.

d) says that if Aφ = aφ, and if Bφ ≠ 0, then A(Bφ) is a scalar multiple of Bφ …

prove it using c).​