Is a tennis ball technically a composite or a polymer?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A tennis ball is classified as a composite material due to its construction from two distinct polymers: rubber and felt. While both materials are polymers, their differing properties and roles in the structure of the tennis ball lead to its classification as a composite. The felt covering contributes to the ball's performance by affecting its friction and spin, although its impact on the overall deformational response is debated. Additionally, woolen fibers, which make up felt, are complex protein polymers, further complicating the classification of materials involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of composite materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of polymer chemistry, specifically regarding rubber and felt
  • Familiarity with structural mechanics and material behavior
  • Basic concepts of protein structure and polymer classification
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and classifications of composite materials
  • Study the mechanical properties of rubber and felt as polymers
  • Explore the role of surface materials in sports equipment performance
  • Investigate the structure and classification of protein fibers in textiles
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, polymer chemists, sports equipment designers, and anyone interested in the classification and performance of composite materials in sports applications.

skyturnred
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Under which class of materials would the following materials be categorized?
What are/is the primary bond type(s) in each material/object?

a. Tennis Ball

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



We'll consider a very simple and standard tennis ball composed of a rubber material covered with felt.

Here is where I'm confused:

A composite material is any material that is made of two or more materials with significantly different properties.

Felt and rubber obviously have significantly different properties

However, rubber and felt are both polymers on their own

So I am having a hard time deciding whether a tennis ball can be classified as a composite or a polymer. Any ideas?

PS: Even the statement of "felt is a polymer" is confusing to me. Felt is a cloth made of woolen fibers. Woolen fibers are themselves protein fibres composed of more than 20 different amino acids.

Although the amino acids are polymers and protein fibers are polymers, is it correct to classify woolen fibers as polymers since they are composed of many different types?

Thank-you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Question is ambiguous, no wonder you have problems answering it. I would answer stating both rubber and felt parts are a separate polymers.
 
Even though the felt and rubber are both polymers, in terms of structural mechanics, they are considered separate materials, and a tennis ball is considered a composite. The cord/rubber plies of a radial tire are typically composites of rubber and steel cords. If the steel tire cords are replaced by Kevlar (polymeric) cords, the plies are still considered composites.
 
Isn't the felt put just outside? My understanding is that in composites properties of the final material are different from the properties of the components, here we have a rubber ball (that behaves like a rubber ball) covered with felt (that behaves like felt). It is no more composite than a painted steel is.
 
Borek said:
Isn't the felt put just outside? My understanding is that in composites properties of the final material are different from the properties of the components, here we have a rubber ball (that behaves like a rubber ball) covered with felt (that behaves like felt). It is no more composite than a painted steel is.
Maybe not exactly. It all depends on whether or not the felt has a non-negligible effect on the overall deformational response of the ball. I'm not sure whether the load-deformation behavior of a bald tennis ball is essentially the same as the load deformation behavior of a tennis ball with felt covering (and thus whether a bald tennis ball performs in play the same as a tennis ball covered with felt). My guess is that it doesn't. In the case of painted steel, the paint does have a negligible effect on the deformational response of the steel.
 
Chestermiller said:
I'm not sure whether the load-deformation behavior of a bald tennis ball is essentially the same as the load deformation behavior of a tennis ball with felt covering (and thus whether a bald tennis ball performs in play the same as a tennis ball covered with felt). My guess is that it doesn't.

Interesting point. I always thought the felt is there just to add friction, making it easier to spin the ball.
 
skyturnred said:
PS: Even the statement of "felt is a polymer" is confusing to me. Felt is a cloth made of woolen fibers. Woolen fibers are themselves protein fibres composed of more than 20 different amino acids.

Although the amino acids are polymers and protein fibers are polymers, is it correct to classify woolen fibers as polymers since they are composed of many different types?

Thank-you

Just a note about your PS... wool is made up of a class of protein fibers composed of 20 different amino acids.

The protein is a polymer of amino acids. Amino acids are the monomers that make up the protein. AND, if you are interested, the wool itself can be described as a composite since the hair shaft is itself composed of several different keratins that make up the cuticle, fibers and matrix.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K