Is Absolute Convergence Required for Evaluating Sums over Rational Numbers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Rational Sum
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
it is possible to evaluate sums over the set of Rational

so [tex]\sum_{q} f(q)[/tex] with [tex]q= \frac{m}{n}[/tex] and m and n are POSITIVE integers different from 0 ??

in any case for a suitable function is possible to evaluate

[tex]\sum_{q} f(qx)[/tex] with f(0)=0 ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think so, as the rationals are countable.
 
um.. if i use the fundamental theorem of the arithmetic to express m and n as a product of primes could i write or consider at least series over prime or prime powers ? i mean

[tex]\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{p}f(p^{m})[/tex]

in both case this sum is over prime and prime powers is this more or less correct ??

using suitable products of primes we can reproduce every positive rational can't we ?

so we can study 'invariant-under-dilation' formulae as follows

[tex]\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{p}f(xp^{m})[/tex]
 
HallsofIvy is correct: all rearrangements of a series converge to the same value if and only if the series is absolutely convergent. So that can affect the sum.