Is America ready for a woman president?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richard87
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether America is ready for a woman president, exploring various perspectives on gender, political views, and the broader implications of electing a female leader. Participants touch on historical context, potential candidates, and societal readiness, making it a conceptual and debate-oriented conversation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that America is ready for a woman president, but emphasize the importance of the candidate's political views and qualifications.
  • Others argue that societal readiness is contingent on the political landscape and the willingness of women to enter politics.
  • A few participants mention specific candidates, such as Hillary Clinton, and express skepticism about her electability due to perceived baggage and public dislike.
  • There are discussions about the implications of electing leaders from diverse backgrounds, including religion and ethnicity, with some suggesting that a female president might face similar challenges as other minority candidates.
  • Some participants propose that the political system favors certain types of candidates, indicating a preference for those who appeal to the center rather than extreme positions.
  • Several comments reflect a desire for a president with strong moral and ethical values, independent of party affiliation.
  • There is a recurring theme of skepticism regarding the election of an openly atheist president, with some noting existing societal biases against non-religious candidates.
  • Participants also discuss the marketing aspect of political campaigns, suggesting that presentation and public perception play significant roles in electability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that America could be ready for a woman president, but there is no consensus on the conditions necessary for this to happen, nor on which candidates would be viable. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of gender, political affiliation, and societal readiness.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of "readiness," the influence of political party dynamics, and the unresolved nature of societal attitudes toward female candidates and other minority groups.

Is it?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 95.8%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't know

    Votes: 1 4.2%

  • Total voters
    24
  • #31
mheslep said:
I believe the US would have elected an American version of Margaret Thatcher 30 years ago.
Most likely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
berkeman said:
I nominate Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, in no particular order for VP and P. Awesome ticket, IMO.

I actually thought the republicans would have won if they'd chosen Powell as VP this time around. But with things the way they were going, I'm sure they purposefully threw the election with their VP choice.

Now if they could just get Palin's twin to run on their ticket:

tina-fey.jpg

Tina Fey

I'd schwing from Demo to Rep for her.

Oh but she's just a comedienne turned actress. What qualifies her as presidential material?

bfb.jpg


What indeed...

But in all seriousness, a Fey-Rice or Rice-Fey ticket would rule. I'd sleep easily with either of these ladies at the helm.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
826
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 350 ·
12
Replies
350
Views
30K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K