Is an IDE Necessary for Debugging Fortran Code?

  • Context: Fortran 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eclipse Fortran
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on debugging Fortran code using Eclipse with the Parallel Tools Platform on Mac OS Snow Leopard. The user encountered issues building a Fortran project, specifically related to the Makefile and the gfortran compiler not being found. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly configuring the PATH environment variable to ensure Eclipse can locate the gfortran compiler, as well as the necessity of having a valid Makefile for project builds. The user ultimately learns to start Eclipse from the terminal to inherit the correct PATH settings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Eclipse IDE and its project configurations
  • Familiarity with Fortran programming language
  • Knowledge of Makefiles and their role in project builds
  • Basic command line skills on Mac OS
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to create and configure Makefiles for Fortran projects
  • Research how to set and modify the PATH environment variable on Mac OS
  • Explore Eclipse IDE settings for managing toolchains and project types
  • Investigate common Fortran compiler errors and their resolutions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for Fortran developers, Eclipse users, and anyone troubleshooting build issues related to Fortran projects on Mac OS.

  • #61
AlephZero said:
An IDE doesn't debug your code for you.

You debug code by thinking. and playing with an IDE is often a distraction from that.

Of course you need a debugger to tell you the basic information like where your code crashed. But 99% of the time you can get all the information you need from a core dump and a stack trace, wthout the pretty graphics.

I AlphaZero! :smile: I was just messing around with XCode and I noticed the term GDB everywhere. So I looked it up. It's a debugger! So yes, I understand now that an IDE is not a debugger.

So let's say for a second that I want to get into programming without an IDE. So I would need to learn about these things that you mentioned: core dump, stack trace and probably other things as well. Are these things that are generated by the 'debugger' (e.g. GDB)?
 
Technology news on Phys.org
  • #62
AlephZero said:
An IDE doesn't debug your code for you.

You debug code by thinking. and playing with an IDE is often a distraction from that.

Of course you need a debugger to tell you the basic information like where your code crashed. But 99% of the time you can get all the information you need from a core dump and a stack trace, wthout the pretty graphics.

I kind of like point-and-click, multiple-views and language-sensitive-keyboard-shortcuts to make it easier to find compiler errors and to debug code. :)

To find problems in mathematical formulas I agree that an IDE tends to distract.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K