Is B^{ij}_i a Contravariant Vector?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that B^{ij}_{i}, a third-order tensor, is a contravariant vector. The participants emphasize the importance of the definition of a contravariant vector, noting that it must transform correctly under coordinate changes. A key point made is that the expression g^{ij}B^{ij}_{i} does not yield a valid result due to index repetition, and the correct transformation for B^{ij}_{i} is provided as B^{i' j'}_{i'} = \frac{\partial x^{j'}}{\partial x^{j}} B^{ij}_i. The conclusion is that B^{ij}_{i} can indeed be shown to satisfy the properties of a contravariant vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the concept of contravariant vectors
  • Knowledge of the summation convention in tensor calculus
  • Basic principles of coordinate transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of contravariant and covariant tensors
  • Learn about the summation convention and its applications in tensor calculus
  • Explore coordinate transformations and their effects on tensor components
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of tensors in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics and physics, particularly those studying tensor analysis and its applications in fields such as general relativity and continuum mechanics.

cristina89
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


B is a third order tensor. Show that B^{ij}_{i} is a contravariant vector.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well... I just thought about a simple solution but I don't think I'm right. But anyways.
Considering B^{ij}_{i}. If I raise the index i: g^{ij}B^{ij}_{i} = B^{ijj}
And so I can say that B is a first order tensor = vector. And this is a contravariant vector.
Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


cristina89 said:

Homework Statement


B is a third order tensor. Show that B^{ij}_{i} is a contravariant vector.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well... I just thought about a simple solution but I don't think I'm right. But anyways.
Considering B^{ij}_{i}. If I raise the index i: g^{ij}B^{ij}_{i} = B^{ijj}
You can't have the same index three times! Also, using the "summation convention" you sum over one "upper" and one "lower" index so even if you wrote g^{kj}B^{ij}_k, you would not be summing. Perhaps what you mean is g^k_jB^{ij}_k= B^i

And so I can say that B is a first order tensor = vector. And this is a contravariant vector.
Is this right?
Well, what is the definition of a contravariant vector? Can you show that this satisfies that definition? Remember that it is NOT enough just to show that something can be written with a single index- you can write an array, in a given coordinate system, indexed with a single index- that does not make it a "vector". A vector must change coordinates correctly as the coordinate system changes. If I remember correctly (it's been a while!) one test for a contravariant vector, written as v^i, is that the combination g_{ij}v^iv^j (essentially the vector length) is a scalar. Which, again, does not just mean "a number" in a given coordinate system. A scalar (0 order tensor) must not change when you change coordinate systems.
 


Equally well you can show that B^{ij}_i transforms as a vector, ie. if I do a coordinate transform x^{i} \rightarrow x^{i'}, B should transform as
B^{i' j'}_{i'} = \frac{\partial x^{j'}}{\partial x^{j}} B^{ij}_i
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K