Is B2 a compound with no sigma bond but only a pi bond?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Indranil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond Sigma
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of bonding in the compound B2, specifically whether it can exist with only pi bonds and no sigma bonds. Participants explore theoretical possibilities, definitions of bonding types, and the implications of electronic structure on bond formation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that compounds without sigma bonds do not exist, as sigma bonds are fundamental to covalent bonding, with double and triple bonds containing one or more sigma bonds alongside pi bonds.
  • Others propose that steric constraints might prevent sigma bond formation, questioning if any scenarios could support this idea.
  • One participant discusses the ambiguity in defining sigma bonds, suggesting that the maximum electron density criterion could exclude certain interactions, such as those in ferrocene or alkyne compounds.
  • Another participant mentions that back-bonding in metal-ethylene complexes could illustrate cases where pi bonds are significant, though the forward donation might involve sigma bonds.
  • Some participants highlight B2 as a potential example where two "half pi" bonds might be stronger than a single sigma bond, noting its paramagnetic nature and the influence of orbital interactions on bonding characteristics.
  • There is a suggestion that careful calculations of bond orders in B2 could reveal a minimal sigma bonding contribution, which becomes less significant in heavier elements like nitrogen and beyond.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of compounds with only pi bonds. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the definitions and implications of sigma and pi bonding, particularly in the context of B2.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining sigma and pi bonds, the role of electronic structure in bonding, and the potential for ambiguity in certain chemical interactions. There are unresolved questions regarding the conditions under which sigma bonds may or may not form.

Indranil
Messages
177
Reaction score
11
Could suggest a compound with no sigma bond only with the pi bond?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hi,

This kind of compound does not exist, as long as simple covalent bond is sigma bond and a double/triple covalent bond have one sigma bond and 1 or 2 pi bonds (respectively).
 
When you think about it, any atom with, say, p orbitals available to form pi bonds would also be able to form sigma bonds with them; and that sigma would be more energetically favoured. So we would have to rely on steric constraints preventing sigma bond formation. It is difficult to imagine a scenario where that would be the case. Can you think of one?
 
This depends on the precise definition of a sigma bond. I'm not sure there is one. If you require cylindrical symmetry of the bond (as in the Wikipedia article), then you have to contend with the fact that C2H2 (or any alkyne) has a cylindrically symmetric pi electron density. On the other hand, it's unclear whether you can call the interaction between Fe and Cp in ferrocene a sigma interaction, even though the bonding is clearly covalent and quite strong.

I suppose you could make the argument that a sigma bond is one where the maximum electron density lies on the line connecting the two atom centers (this would exclude the pi electron sheath in acetylene, whose wavefunction has a node along this line). I can't think of any attractive atom-atom interaction where this criterion would not be present. Maybe in side-bonded H2 or ethylene η2 transition metal complexes? The bond here is formed between a filled metal d-orbital and the empty antibonding orbital (σ* for H2 and π* for C2H4), along with a "backbond" between the filled H-H or C=C bonding orbitals and an empty metal d-orbital. (I use quotes because I'm not sure that the metalheads consider this a true backbond.) It would require an eelctronic structure calculation to figure out the maximum electron density of this bonding configuration. Maybe I'll give it a shot if I have time.
 
Yes, the back-bonding in complexes of ethylene with metal ions would certainly be candidates for pi bonds - though the forward donation part of the bonding could be construed as 2 sigma bonds. This is territory where things are not so clean-cut!
 
Indranil said:
Could suggest a compound with no sigma bond only with the pi bond?
B2
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borek and TeethWhitener
DrDu said:
B2

B2 is a good call! It does indeed seem to be a case where 2 "half pi" bonds are stronger that a single sigma bond. However B2 is paramagnetic so high spin could play a part in that.
 
Jason2 said:
B2 is a good call! It does indeed seem to be a case where 2 "half pi" bonds are stronger that a single sigma bond. However B2 is paramagnetic so high spin could play a part in that.
Another effect which contributes here is that the 2pz orbitals and the resulting sigma bond get pushed up by the 2s orbitals on the neighbouring atom. On the other hand, the 2s orbitals get lowered in energy. Probably a careful calculation of the bond orders would reveal that there is a net sigma bonding contribution though much smaller than in typical sigma bound compounds.
This mechanism becomes unimportant in later compound of the series, as the s-p energy difference increases when going from B to C, N, O, F. E.g. in N2, the sigma bond formed from the pz orbitals is lower than the pi bond orbitals.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K