Is Ben Bernanke facing political pressure as Fed chair?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rootX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Economy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the Federal Reserve's monetary policies under Ben Bernanke, particularly in the context of borrowing and spending in the U.S. economy. Participants explore the effects of fiscal stimulus, the yield curve, and the relationship between debt and economic growth. The conversation includes various perspectives on whether current monetary strategies are beneficial or detrimental.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the logic of borrowing significant amounts of money to distribute to the public, suggesting it contradicts responsible financial practices.
  • Others argue that the Federal Reserve's primary concern is maintaining a healthy yield curve rather than focusing solely on inflation or exchange rates.
  • A participant asserts that the Fed is not borrowing money but creating it, which raises questions about the nature of debt and its implications for the economy.
  • There are differing views on whether stimulus programs can effectively address recessionary pressures, with some asserting that they cannot buy a way out of economic downturns.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the reliability of yield curves as indicators of future economic conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about consumer saving behavior and its potential impact on interest rates and economic growth.
  • References to external articles and statements from Ben Bernanke highlight ongoing debates about the Fed's approach to managing national debt and economic policy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as multiple competing views remain regarding the effectiveness and implications of the Fed's monetary policies and the broader economic strategies being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the nature of debt and monetary policy depend on specific definitions and assumptions that are not universally agreed upon. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations of economic principles and the Fed's role in the economy.

  • #31
mheslep said:
How? Why? Bernanke doesn't have to win any elections.
Maybe slightly. But then the Fed has two mandates, not one, as Geitner mentioned in the quote. The current Fed dual charter may indeed be a mistake, but for the moment there it is. Even so I don't know how that runs counter to what Geitner said.

I was using the term politics in the more general sense -
Politics . . . . is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The term is generally applied to behavior within civil governments, but politics has been observed in other group interactions, including corporate, academic, and religious institutions. It consists of "social relations involving authority or power" . . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics

Authority, power, influence - folks in Washington, the Fed, various cities, corporations, . . . . are vying for power and influence . . . .

Fed politics and Washington politics clash.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
WhoWee said:
My point was that the Fed is eyeball deep in politics. Bernanke is all over the planet giving speeches.
And he has a beard and where's dark suits. Of course he gives speeches. He does not, however, give baby kissing vote for me speeches. He's the chairman of the US central bank, and he should be out there explaining his actions everyday.

I guess you didn't get a chance to open either of these links I posted?

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article7000881.ece
"Obama urges Senate to stand by Ben Bernanke"
Because you made the point about Bush - and
Which means the President is political, not Bernanke. This is also basically what every President says, all the time - stay with the Fed chair do give the markets confidence in some stability.

http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/ChinaUrgesBernanketoStopthePrintingPresses/2010/10/28/id/375187
"China Urges Bernanke: Stop Printing Dollars!"
then you made the point the entire world having a problem with China manipulating currency - who in turn has a problem with the US actions (that will also devalue currency).
Many countries have a problem with QE. So what, in this context about politics? They don't get a vote.

What is your point - other than to find fault with my post?
That Bernanke is relatively isolated from politics as compared to, a politician, and should stay that way as Geitner suggests. You don't like the Fed actions, I get it. I'm not sure I do either wrt QE, and I think I'd like to see the Fed charter changed. That doesn't mean we should all go and conflate that opinion with some conspiracy theory about Bernanke's politics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 204 ·
7
Replies
204
Views
29K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K