Is Blood Pressure Measurement Accurate in Obese Patients?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mwaso
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the accuracy of blood pressure measurements in obese patients, particularly focusing on the effects of cuff size and the potential for misdiagnosis of hypertension. Participants explore various factors that may influence blood pressure readings, including the physical characteristics of the cuff and the anatomy of obese individuals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that using a cuff that is too large can lead to incorrectly low blood pressure readings due to insufficient pressure to compress the artery.
  • Others argue that a cuff that is too small can result in falsely high blood pressure readings because it requires overinflation to adequately compress the artery.
  • One participant introduces the concept of "white coat hypertension," suggesting that anxiety in a clinical setting may contribute to elevated blood pressure readings.
  • There is a proposal that the variation in blood pressure readings due to cuff size may be more pronounced in obese patients, leading to potential misdiagnosis of hypertension.
  • A participant raises a question about the impact of fat tissue on blood pressure measurement accuracy, comparing it to the difficulty of obtaining blood samples from animals with varying neck sizes.
  • There is a query regarding whether any blood pressure cuff has been tested for accuracy specifically in obese patients and how traditional measurements compare to intra-arterial catheter readings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of cuff size on blood pressure readings, with no consensus reached on the best practices for measuring blood pressure in obese patients. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall accuracy of blood pressure measurements in this demographic.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of definitive studies on the effects of fat tissue on blood pressure measurement accuracy and the dependence on cuff size definitions. The discussion also highlights the need for further investigation into the reliability of different measurement techniques in obese patients.

mwaso
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
so, when measuring blood pressure, if you use a cuff that's too large for the patient, you get an incorrectly low reading. This doesn't make sense to me. why?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
A large cuff doesn't apply enough pressure to compress the artery, with smaller arm size.

It also works the other way. Some obese people are incorrectly diagnosed with high blood pressure when in fact, their blood pressure is actually normal! This false diagnosis is based on improper use of blood pressure equipment, namely using a cuff that's to small.
 
Add to that "white coat hypertension" = I'm in a doctors office, he's going to tell me off for being fat , I'm going to die... puts most people into the high blood pressure category.
 
Last edited:
hypatia said:
A large cuff doesn't apply enough pressure to compress the artery, with smaller arm size.

Actually, it's the opposite. The large cuff doesn't need to be inflated as much to compress the artery on a smaller arm, so gives an erroneously low reading. Likewise, if a cuff is too small, it will have to be overinflated to get it to compress the artery adequately, so will give an erroneously high reading.
 
Moonbear said:
Actually, it's the opposite. The large cuff doesn't need to be inflated as much to compress the artery on a smaller arm, so gives an erroneously low reading. Likewise, if a cuff is too small, it will have to be overinflated to get it to compress the artery adequately, so will give an erroneously high reading.

As Moonbear says, too small a cuff will give an artificially high reading:

http://www.nature.com/jhh/journal/v11/n7/abs/1000470a.html

With the smallest bladder (13 ´ 23 cm) the highest systolic and diastolic BP was measured (mean SBP 127.2 mean DBP 77.0 mm Hg), followed by the bladder of 13 ´ 36 cm (125.1 resp. 75.4 mm Hg). The lowest BP was measured with the bladder of 16 ´ 23 cm (123.7 resp. 74.4 mm Hg).

An interesting point made by some studies is that hypertension may be misdiagnosed in a number of obese patients for this reason. The variation with cuff size seems to be more pronounced with obese patients as well.
 
berkeman said:
An interesting point made by some studies is that hypertension may be misdiagnosed in a number of obese patients for this reason. The variation with cuff size seems to be more pronounced with obese patients as well.

I wonder how much variation or error is introduced by the obesity by itself. In other words, regardless of the size of cuff, would the artery be properly occluded with a consistent inflation pressure when there is so much fat is between the cuff and artery? Fat has such a different texture than muscle, would having to compress a lot of fat to compress the artery give an inaccurate reading all by itself?

The only comparison I can think of to explain my reasoning is when I collect blood samples from farm animals. It takes relatively little effort to compress the jugular vein of a sheep enough to "puff" it up to get a blood sample...just a light pressure with my thumb. In contrast, to get a blood sample from a cow, light pressure with my thumb isn't going to cut it. With all the fat, you need to lean your whole fist into their neck to adequately compress the jugular vein to get a blood sample. It takes more pressure to occlude the vein of a cow with a fat neck than a sheep with a skinnier neck.

Has anyone tested if any blood pressure cuff gives an accurate reading in obese patients? How does the use of a sphygmomanometer compare with bp measurements using an intra-arterial catheter?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K