Is Brownian motion a purely classical phenomenon or is it also quantm?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Brownian motion is primarily a classical phenomenon, as demonstrated by Einstein's 1905 paper, which utilized classical mechanics to explain the motion of particles in a fluid. Quantum effects, such as quantum uncertainty and scattering, are generally not necessary unless the interactions during collisions are significant. Classical models remain accurate for elastic collisions. However, "quantum Brownian motion" introduces non-Markovian descriptions, which are explored in the paper by Ford, Lewis, and O’Connell (1988).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of Brownian motion and its historical context
  • Basic grasp of quantum statistics
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Einstein's 1905 paper on Brownian motion
  • Explore the concept of quantum Brownian motion
  • Study the Quantum Langevin equation from the paper by Ford, Lewis, and O’Connell (1988)
  • Investigate the implications of non-Markovian processes in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the intersection of classical and quantum theories, particularly in the context of particle dynamics.

Aidyan
Messages
182
Reaction score
14
A water molecule is as tiny as 0.3 Angstrom. I would expect that quantum effects play a role. I'm wondering if its Brownian motion in a fluid is determined only by classical thermodynamics or if its collisional processes must take into account also quantum scatterings or other effects like quantum uncertainty? I looked for this but couldn't find anyone considering this. Any suggestion?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Physics news on Phys.org
When Einstein explained the Brownian motion in one of his wonderful papers of 1905 (https://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/UG/SM/MATH3075/r/Einstein_1905.pdf), he used classical mechanics only. Quantum mechanics was not invented yet, though Einstein himself was concurrently working on it. Unless you have a case where the details of the interactions during the collisions become relevant, you are unlikely to need quantum mechanics. As long as the collisions are elastic, a classical model is accurate enough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost, PeroK and vanhees71
Of course there's also "quantum Brownian motion". Interstingly it always leads to non-Markovian descriptions. A nice paper, which should be understandable at the introductory quantum-statistics-lecture level (or even after the QM 1 lecture) is

G. W. Ford, J. T. Lewis and R. F. O’Connell, Quantum
Langevin equation, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4419 (1988),
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.4419
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K