Is Composition by a Mapping a Linear Isomorphism in Vector Spaces?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the linear mapping properties of function composition in vector spaces, specifically addressing the mapping \( T : F(B,R) \rightarrow F(A,R) \) defined by \( T(f) = f \circ \phi \). It establishes that if \( \phi \) is a bijective mapping, then \( T \) is an isomorphism. The discussion provides a detailed proof structure for demonstrating that \( \phi \) being injective ensures \( T \) is surjective, and \( \phi \) being surjective ensures \( T \) is injective, thus confirming the linear isomorphism between the function spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and linear mappings
  • Familiarity with function composition in mathematical analysis
  • Knowledge of bijective functions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of injectivity and surjectivity in mappings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear mappings in vector spaces
  • Learn about bijective functions and their implications in function theory
  • Explore the concept of isomorphisms in functional analysis
  • Investigate the role of injective and surjective mappings in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying linear algebra and functional analysis, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of function properties and mappings in vector spaces.

fluxions
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sorry for the vague title!

Let R denote the set of real numbers, and F(S,R) denote the set of all functions from a set S to R.

Part 1: Let \phi be any mapping from a set A to a set B. Show that composition by \phi is a linear mapping from F(B,R) to F(A,R). That is, show that T : F(B,R) \rightarrow F(A,R) : f \mapsto f \circ \phi is linear.

Part 2: In the situation given in part 1, show that T is an isomorphism if \phi is bijective by show that:
(a) \phi injective implies T surjective;
(b) \phi surjective implies T injective.



The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I got part 1.
As for part 2... I have no clue. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, I will get you started on (a.) So we are supposing \phi is 1-1. So for each a in A there is a unique b in B such that b = \phi(a) and a =\phi^{-1}(b). Now suppose you are given g in F(A,R). To show T is onto, you need to build an f in F(B,R) such that T(f) = g, that is f\circ\phi = g.

For b \in \phi(A), try defining f(b) = g(\phi^{-1}(b)). Now see if you can show that T(f) = g, which is the same as showing f\circ\phi = g.

Also note, if b is exterior to \phi(A), it doesn't matter what you define f(b).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K