Is Cosh(4z) Integrable Along Any Path Between -πi/8 and πi/8?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integrability of the function cosh(4z) along a specified path in the complex plane, specifically from \(-\frac{\pi i}{8}\) to \(\frac{\pi i}{8}\). Participants are examining whether the function is analytic and how that affects the integration process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant attempts to integrate cosh(4z) by checking the conditions for analyticity using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, expressing uncertainty about their path representation. Another participant argues that cosh(4z) is indeed analytic and suggests splitting the function into real and imaginary parts to apply the Cauchy-Riemann conditions. There is also a side discussion about the pronunciation of "Cauchy."

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with differing views on the analyticity of cosh(4z). Some participants are exploring the implications of this analyticity on the integration process, while others are questioning the assumptions made in the initial approach. There is no explicit consensus yet, but participants are engaging with the concepts presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of complex analysis, particularly the conditions under which integration can be performed. The discussion includes references to the fundamental theorem of calculus and the need for clarity on the function's analyticity.

John O' Meara
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Integrate cosh(4z) w.r.t., z, for any path from [tex]\frac{-\pi i}{8} \inbox{to } \frac{\pi i}{8}[/tex]. If the function is analytic, i.e., obeys Cauchy - Riemann equations we can integrate as in standard calculus.
[tex]\frac{{\partial \cosh(4(x+iy)}}{{\partial x}} = a\sinh(4x + 4iy) \\ \frac{{\partial \cosh(4x +4iy)}}{{\partial y }} = 4i\sinh(4x + 4iy)\\[/tex]. Therefore [tex]u_x[/tex] and [tex]v_y[/tex] are not equal, therefore the cosh(4z) is not analytic. So we integrate as follows: C (the path of integration) can be represented by z(t)= 0 + it, [tex]\frac{-\pi}{8} \leq t \leq \frac{\pi}{8}\\[/tex] Hence [tex]\dot z(t) = \iota \\[/tex] and f(z(t)) = cosh(it), therefore [tex]\int_C \cosh(z) dz = \int_{\frac{-\pi}{8}}^\frac{\pi}{8} \cosh(it)\iota dt \\[/tex] = sinh(it) evulated at the respective limits = [tex]2\sinh(\frac{\iota\pi}{8}) \[/tex]
I don't think that this is correct, I think my Z(t) = 0 +it is wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cosh(4z) IS analytic. You have to split the function into real and imaginary parts before applying CR. cosh(z)=(e^z+e^-z)/2. Now e.g. e^z=e^(x+iy)=e^x*e^(iy)=e^x*(cos(y)+i*sin(y)). So the split for e^z is u(x,y)=e^x*cos(y) and v(x,y)=e^x*sin(y) and it IS analytic. Similarly for cosh(z).
 
Thanks for the reply Dick. As a matter of interest do you know how "Cauchy" is pronounced? E.g., Ca-u-chy?
 
John O' Meara said:
Thanks for the reply Dick. As a matter of interest do you know how "Cauchy" is pronounced? E.g., Ca-u-chy?

Co-she, 'co' as in coordinate and 'she' as in she. You're welcome.
 
You can use the fundamental theorem of calculus here, it is easy to find the primitive of cosh(4z)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K