Is Coulomb's Law the Correct Equation for This Calculation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Coulomb's Law to calculate the force of repulsion between two individuals with a 1% excess of electrons compared to protons. The equation used is F = k |q1||q2| / r², where the charge (q) is derived from the number of electrons in a human body. The correct approach involves estimating the total number of atoms in an average human body, which is approximately 7 x 10²⁷, and calculating the charge based on 1% of that value. The final calculation yields a force of approximately 1.03 x 10²⁵ Newtons when using a distance of 0.85 meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law and its application in electrostatics
  • Basic atomic structure and the concept of protons and electrons
  • Understanding of charge conversion from electrons to Coulombs
  • Order-of-magnitude calculations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of Coulomb's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about atomic composition and the average number of atoms in various biological entities
  • Study charge conversion techniques, specifically from elementary charge to Coulombs
  • Explore order-of-magnitude estimation methods in scientific calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of atomic charge in practical scenarios.

zandbera
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Nobel laureate Richard Feynman once said that if 2 persons stood at arm's length from each other and each person had 1% more electrons than protons, the force of repulsion between them would be enough to lift a "weight" equal to that of the entire Earth. Carry out an order-of-magnitude calculation to substantiate this assertion.


Homework Equations


F = k |q1||q2| / r2


The Attempt at a Solution


I had no idea to do this so i used Coulombs law with q1 = q1 = -e
I used -e because it said there's 1% more electrons so if there's 100 protons, there's 101 electroons and 100 of the electrons would cancel out the protons so the net charge is 1 electron (e). but then It didnt said anything about r so i just guessed and used r = 2 m and then again with r = 1.5m but i got an answer that was x 10^-28 and the answer is supposed to be ~1025

Am I even using the right equation??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you're using the right equation, but you need to make a better guess on how many electrons each person will have - how much charge to use.

Try to find how many atoms or protons are in the average human body. Then use a charge equal to 1% of that value of protons. If you can only find atoms, use an educated guess as to how many protons a body has from that number of atoms.

googled for you:

"A 70 kg body would have approximately 7*1027 atoms. That is, 7 followed by 27 zeros:

7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000"

source: http://education.jlab.org/qa/mathatom_04.html (not too reputable but who cares. see if it gives you an appropriate answer)

So for you rcharge, use .01 * 7 * 1027 electrons

also, i measured my arm just now

with hand: ~85 cm
without hand: ~55cm

your distance is way too high

lol 2m = ~6ft. your arm is as tall as a person? :D
 
Last edited:
Yeah okay I was thinking about that and that makes sense.

And yeah I misunderstood the question. I thought they meant each person was an arms length away so the total distance between them was 2 arms lengths so i used 2(0.75) and 2(1.0)

With that info, I got 6.10 x 10^61. Which is way too high
 
Did you convert the charge units into Coulombs?
 
Yeah that's where the problem was.

If I use # of electrons = 1.8 x 10^28, then take 1% of that, then multiply that by 1.602 x 10^-19 to convert to Coulombs, square that value, multiply by k, divide by r^2 (r = .85 m) and i get 1.03 x 10^25Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K