Is Cursive Writing No Longer Essential in Indiana Schools?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the decision by the Indiana Department of Education to no longer require cursive writing in public schools. Participants explore the relevance and necessity of cursive writing in modern education and daily life, considering its implications for handwriting skills, typing, and emerging technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that cursive writing is largely unnecessary, as most writing done after school is typed rather than handwritten.
  • Others share personal experiences of transitioning away from cursive, noting that they primarily use printing or a mix of printing and cursive for speed and efficiency.
  • A few participants mention the importance of being able to read cursive, suggesting that while teaching perfect cursive may not be essential, some exposure should remain.
  • Concerns are raised about the time investment required to teach cursive writing, with some questioning whether it is worth the effort given the prevalence of typing.
  • There is speculation about the future of typing due to advancements in voice recognition technology, with some suggesting that this could render traditional writing skills obsolete.
  • Participants reflect on their own handwriting skills, with many admitting to having lost proficiency in cursive and relying on printing or informal styles.
  • Some discuss the practicalities of note-taking in meetings, contrasting the use of laptops for typing versus handwritten notes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express a lack of consensus on the necessity of cursive writing, with multiple competing views on its relevance and the implications of its removal from school curricula. Some agree on the declining importance of cursive, while others advocate for its continued teaching in some form.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is influenced by personal experiences and the changing landscape of communication technology, which may affect the perceived value of cursive writing.

jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2025 Award
Messages
16,107
Reaction score
8,084
Starting this fall, the Indiana Department of Education will no longer require Indiana’s public schools to teach cursive writing.

http://tribstar.com/news/x1435410216/Archaic-Method-Cursive-writing-no-longer-has-to-be-taught (Terre Haute Tribune-Star)

I type faster and more neatly than I can write, so the only things I write now are my signature, shopping lists and other short lists, notes on freehand diagrams, and mathematical stuff (solving a physics or math problem, or just playing around with equations). And stuff on the whiteboard when lecturing. I almost never use PowerPoint for lectures.

Almost all of my handwriting is "scribble-printing." I use cursive only for my signature, and the "for deposit only" notation when endorsing a check for deposit in my bank account. Sometimes I write a paragraph or two in cursive, just to keep in practice. I have to focus on it when I'm doing it.

I've gotten good enough with MathType in MS Word that I even use it to write up math that I want to keep "for the record," such as solutions to test or homework problems that I assign. For me, MathType alone is slower than hand-writing the equations, but faster than writing them first and then transcribing to MathType. I suppose I really should be using LaTeX for that, but I've never gotten into LaTeX for entire documents.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Most people have dropped cursive except for signatures, I have. Do we really need two ways of writing, when most writing after you leave school is usually jotting notes?

No one turns in hand written reports, it's all typed on a computer and printed out.
 
Evo said:
Most people have dropped cursive except for signatures, I have. Do we really need two ways of writing, when most writing after you leave school is usually jotting notes?

No one turns in hand written reports, it's all typed on a computer and printed out.

I'm glad to hear this. I thought I was weird for not being able to write cursive (except my signature). I started printing when I started college back in the '60s and have completely forgotten how to write in cursive. :blushing:
 
All through junior high and high school, once cursive was no longer a requirement, I used printing pretty much exclusively where hand written work was necessary. When I got to college, though, I found that I couldn't write fast enough to keep up with some of my profs, so I actually (painfully) switched back to cursive for the first semester. It sped me up a little bit, but once I got proficient in cursive, I found myself naturally switching to a sort of mix between printing and cursive. I've written like that ever since, and while it's not as neat as my printing was, it's improved my writing speed by at least 2 times.

However, I agree that typing is a more important skill than cursive. Probably 90% of my handwritten text (not including math/calculations, which is a different story) comes from lecture notes, assignments where hand writing is a requirement (like lab reports), and written exams. The rest is just quickly jotting things down or writing an explanation here and there within my math. If I weren't taking classes, the ability to write in cursive would be of very little benefit to me. I'd definitely trade that for another 10-20 wpm of typing speed.

As the article points out, though, being able to read cursive is still important. For that reason, they probably shouldn't cut out cursive completely, but I think it would be beneficial to cut out a lot of the time spent teaching kids to write in perfect cursive and instead teach them how to type efficiently.
 
How much time does it take to teach a kid to write cursive? I really don't remember how hard it was to learn. If it takes a lot of time, it's probably not worth it.
 
I keep wondering if typing will soon be obsolete due to voice recognition software.

I too have virtually lost my cursive skills - or any writing skills beyond the chicken scratching that only I can read. On the up side, if someone ever steals my notes it will do them no good.
 
lisab said:
How much time does it take to teach a kid to write cursive? I really don't remember how hard it was to learn. If it takes a lot of time, it's probably not worth it.
It's a lot of time, chidren have to learn cursive and printing. I could print clearly, but all of the silly little flourishes for cursiive were so time consuming, so I just went with semi-connected printing, which a lot of people went to. And only used cursive when it was a test on writing in cursive.

Now in meetings, people usually bring their laptops or other devices and just type notes instead of writing and then typing them. Saves a lot of time, you can spell check, do editing, etc... all at once.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
I keep wondering if typing will soon be obsolete due to voice recognition software.

I too have virtually lost my cursive skills - or any writing skills beyond the chicken scratching that only I can read. On the up side, if someone ever steals my notes it will do them no good.
LOL, exactly.
 
I was taught cursive in grade 3-4, and was forced to use it until grade 6. As soon as I hit grade 6, I dropped it. I do remember how to write cursive but over the years my hand writing has developed into a form of printing where all the letters are attached, it's fast.
 
  • #10
Evo said:
Now in meetings, people usually bring their laptops or other devices and just type notes instead of writing and then typing them.

Very few students do this in my classes. It's probably because of the math-intensive content. Even if a student can touch-type text rapidly, s/he probably doesn't have software to write equations, or isn't fluent enough in it.
 
  • #11
jtbell said:
Very few students do this in my classes. It's probably because of the math-intensive content. Even if a student can touch-type text rapidly, s/he probably doesn't have software to write equations, or isn't fluent enough in it.
I'm talking about business meetings where nothing of importance is said.
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
I keep wondering if typing will soon be obsolete due to voice recognition software.

Evo said:
LOL, exactly.

Interesting idea. Physicsforums.com/Talk/voice_your_post. :cool:
 
  • #13
Evo said:
I'm talking about business meetings where nothing of importance is said.

If nothing of importance is being said, then they're probably not taking notes. They're just updating their Facebook status or posting to PF or whatever. :biggrin:
 
  • #14
dlgoff said:
Physicsforums.com/Talk/voice_your_post. :cool:

If it can do LaTex, I'm in. "Second partial of psi with respect to x, plus..."
 
  • #15
jtbell said:
If it can do LaTex, I'm in. "Second partial of psi with respect to x, plus..."
If you have "Chrome 11 Beta", see if these work.

http://ofneal.com/speechwolfram/"
http://ofneal.com/speechsearch/"

From http://ofneal.com/2011/04/speech-search-simple-free-speech-recognition-for-searching-google-wolframalpha-and-facebook/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
Oh thank god...now I can get back to practicing my print...I keep thinking a chicken had a seizure on my notepad at work...
 
  • #17
Ivan Seeking said:
I keep wondering if typing will soon be obsolete due to voice recognition software.

I too have virtually lost my cursive skills - or any writing skills beyond the chicken scratching that only I can read. On the up side, if someone ever steals my notes it will do them no good.

Not just voice recognition software, but the ability to search for spoken words/word combination and to cross reference to other spoken word sequences, etc and do it as fast, or faster, than computers handle numbers/words now. In other words, the ability to create an organized database of spoken words so no "written" records have to be kept at all.

That would be an interesting development if technology made written language, itself, obsolete, seeing as how written language was the key to so much of our technological development.
 
  • #18
Don,

This is one instance when I must respectfully disagree with you. An https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2960338&postcount=27" from a post in my Brain Plasticity thread:
I had one quick question, when you said writing 3 hours a day since 1985, by that did you mean typing (a typewriter in those days) or did you write using print or cursive ? The reason I ask is that I have been told through research that writing in cursive is one of the hardest things out brains are asked to do. When we string several letters together at a time our brain must process more complex movements. If you have trouble writing in cursive, you will also have trouble reading, because of the scanning process used to read then comprehend what you have just exposed your brain to. For people who have a reading disability (not you obviously), simple tracing exercises of complex lines stimulate stimulate neurons in the weakened pre-frontal cortex area of the brain improve your ability to speak, write and read.

Abandoning cursive training may have more detrimental effects than simple convenience, it may affect your ability to read and comprehend material. Not to mention the ability to concentrate, comprehend and recall with accuracy lengthy complex material. I don't see the trend changing. I admit, unless I have no other choice, I will type at a computer versus write a letter with pen and paper in cursive, which would be good for my brain. My daughter had to write letters to her boyfriend who is in the military in print or cursive for awhile. Now that he is active duty they communicate by text message and e-mail.

Rhody...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
In any given school year, I will have one or two students write in cursive, while most have turned to printing, "semi-joined," or chicken scratch. Next to chicken scratch, cursive is THE MOST DIFFICULT TO READ!

Cursive is dying. Let's kill it off!
 
  • #20
rhody said:
Don,

This is one instance when I must respectfully disagree with you.

If you have trouble writing in cursive, you will also have trouble reading, because of the scanning process used to read then comprehend what you have just exposed your brain to. For people who have a reading disability (not you obviously), simple tracing exercises of complex lines stimulate stimulate neurons in the weakened pre-frontal cortex area of the brain improve your ability to speak, write and read.

You have just described me. In my case, I went for several years with a undetected hearing problem from before the first grade to about the forth grade. By the time it was corrected, it was too late. Now my biggest problem is spelling since I heard things differently and phonics made no sense.
 
  • #21
I learned to curse in grade school and my hand is fairly nice, but not great. However, I rarely use it because it is time consuming. I write, like so many others here, with a ruleless style that involves some cursive letters, some block letters and some connecting glue for the purpose, not of looks, but of writing faster. Only my signature is fully cursive.
 
  • #22
Personally, I think it's beneficial to teach other styles of writing. I'm glad that they're not being forced to teach it, but I'm not convinced it's something we should lose. I think at some point, you have to introduce to kids that there's not just one way to write. Sure, if cursive had any practical point to it whenever we learned it, it's lost that by now, but penmanship has always been a hallmark of any advanced civilization and I think exposure to it at a young age is beneficial.
 
  • #23
That explains why nobody here understands wot i rite.

I can only do grr-sive.

:smile:

Edit

Nobody understands me

:cry:
 
  • #24
I, for one, think it's sad that people think cursive should go away. If they stop teaching this at schools, I'd teach it to my kids at home.
 
  • #25
timthereaper said:
...but penmanship has always been a hallmark of any advanced civilization...
Based on what? I would like to think this is true but I'm not sure it is the foregone conclusion you're making it out to be. Please expand.
 
  • #26
But if we get rid of cursive writing, nobody will be able to write romantic love letters anymore!
 
  • #27
Jimmy Snyder said:
I learned to curse in grade school

You must have had interesting teachers. :biggrin:
 
  • #28
I always thought cursive writing was pointless. Cursive seems harder to read and is useless beyong aesthetic value IMO.
 
  • #29
Evo said:
Now in meetings, people usually bring their laptops or other devices and just type notes instead of writing and then typing them. Saves a lot of time, you can spell check, do editing, etc... all at once.
From my experience, people do not bring laptops or other devices to meetings so they can type notes on the content of the meeting. They bring laptops so they can look up a recipe for tonight's dinner; send emails to their significant other, their cousins, their drinkin' buddies from college; and maybe even do a little bit of work -- but never work related to the topic of the meeting. Heaven forbid! Given that hardly anybody takes notes regarding the meeting itself, there are apparently some new societal rules regarding the use of electronic machinery during in play here.
 
  • #30
D H said:
From my experience, people do not bring laptops or other devices to meetings so they can type notes on the content of the meeting. They bring laptops so they can look up a recipe for tonight's dinner; send emails to their significant other, their cousins, their drinkin' buddies from college; and maybe even do a little bit of work -- but never work related to the topic of the meeting. Heaven forbid! Given that hardly anybody takes notes regarding the meeting itself, there are apparently some new societal rules regarding the use of electronic machinery during in play here.
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K