Is Cursive Writing No Longer Essential in Indiana Schools?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
Click For Summary
The Indiana Department of Education will no longer mandate cursive writing instruction in public schools starting this fall, reflecting a broader trend where many individuals primarily use typing for written communication. Participants in the discussion express that cursive is largely unnecessary for daily tasks, with most preferring to print or type for efficiency. While some acknowledge the importance of being able to read cursive, they argue that teaching typing skills is more beneficial. Concerns are raised about the potential cognitive impacts of abandoning cursive, particularly regarding reading and comprehension skills. Overall, the conversation highlights a shift away from cursive writing in favor of more practical writing methods in modern education.
  • #61
I guess I'm in the minority, but I see this as a bad thing. I grew up learning cursive, and had to use it basically all the through school, and pretty much up until college, I had to use it. When I was in school the perception was always pretty much that non-cursive was the "lazy" way to write, and cursive was the elegant, fluid, educated way to write.

Does it actually help you write faster? probably not. But it is somewhat of an artform. I did practive, and to this day I have to write excruciately slow in order to make it come out not looking like chicken scratch. but It's something worth keeping. Some day some archeologist may scratch his head at our cursive and it will have become "heiroglyphs"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
It's a lot eaiser to write cursive in the snow than it is to print in the snow.
 
  • #63
BobG said:
It's a lot eaiser to write cursive in the snow than it is to print in the snow.
:smile: You dog you (respectfully speaking). I know exactly what you mean. Been there done that. :smile:
 
  • #64
dlgoff said:
Now my biggest problem is spelling since I heard things differently and phonics made no sense.

I was reading at age 3, and I still had significant trouble with phonics. What a complete waste of time.
 
  • #65
BobG said:
Not just voice recognition software, but the ability to search for spoken words/word combination and to cross reference to other spoken word sequences, etc and do it as fast, or faster, than computers handle numbers/words now. In other words, the ability to create an organized database of spoken words so no "written" records have to be kept at all.

That would be an interesting development if technology made written language, itself, obsolete, seeing as how written language was the key to so much of our technological development.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hShY6xZWVGE
 
  • #66
Ivan Seeking said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hShY6xZWVGE

Love it. Go Scotty go.
 
  • #67
I've had several professors who won't accept hand written papers unless they are in cursive without errors. Writing things without my computer helps me with better spelling in the long run and makes me a little more diligent; I tend to write in a really sloppy manner when I am on a computer and make really embarrassing grammatical mistakes. Penmanship is good in a classroom situation, and I prefer to do proofs by hand and not on a program-- and cursive makes it look so darn good.
 
  • #68
thegreenlaser said:
I can't see written word ever being completely replaced by spoken word. I MUCH prefer reading to listening, especially with large documents, and I know a lot of people who would agree.

Consider the hearing-impaired, for whom reading versus listening is not a matter of mere preference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
93
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K