Is D1 u D2 Both a Subdivision and a Refinement of D1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheyCallMeMini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the union of two subdivisions, D1 and D2, of the interval [a,b] is both a subdivision and a refinement of D1. It is established that D1 u D2 qualifies as a subdivision of [a,b] because it is a finite subset containing both endpoints. Furthermore, D1 is confirmed as a subset of D1 u D2, satisfying the definition of refinement. The proof relies on the transitive property of refinements and the definitions provided.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical definitions related to subdivisions and refinements.
  • Familiarity with set theory concepts, particularly unions and subsets.
  • Knowledge of logic and proof techniques in mathematics.
  • Basic comprehension of interval notation and properties of finite sets.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of finite subsets in real analysis.
  • Learn about the transitive properties of mathematical relations.
  • Explore advanced proof techniques in set theory.
  • Review the definitions and examples of subdivisions and refinements in mathematical literature.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis and set theory, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to subdivisions and refinements in mathematical proofs.

TheyCallMeMini
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If each of D1 and D2 is a subdivision of [a,b], then...
1. D1 u D2 is a subdivision of [a,b], and
2. D1 u D2 is a refinement of D1.

Homework Equations



**Definition 1: The statement that D is a subdivision of the interval [a,b] means...
1. D is a finite subset of [a,b], and
2. each of a and b belongs to D.


**Definition 2: The statement that K is a refinement of the subdivision D means...
1. K is a subdivision of [a,b], and
2. D is a subset of K.

The Attempt at a Solution



I just proved that, "If K is a refinement of H and H is a refinement of the subdivision D of [a,b], then K is a refinement of D." Well I haven't wrote it down but the 2nd definition part 2 is what makes it easy to relate just being a transitive proof.

My problem is that I've taken a lot of logic courses in the past so when I see the union of two variables I only need to prove that one is actually true. In this particular situation both are true so its obvious but I don't know how to state that fact.

For the 2nd part of the proof, wouldn't I just say that D1 is a subset of itself, and its already given that D1 is a subdivision of [a,b]? It just seems too easy...I also had questions about proofs I've already turned in that I did poorly on but I didn't want to flood this place with questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheyCallMeMini said:
For the 2nd part of the proof, wouldn't I just say that D1 is a subset of itself, and its already given that D1 is a subdivision of [a,b]? It just seems too easy...

Yes, I agree. Since by the first part you will have already shown that D1 u D2 is a subdivision of [a,b], all you have to do in part 2 is simply state that D1 is a subset of D1 u D2, thus the definition of refinement is satisfied.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K