Is Deceleration Really a Forbidden Word in Physics?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tim_lou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deceleration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of deceleration in physics, exploring whether it is a valid term or a misleading descriptor. Participants examine its implications in various contexts, including definitions, frame of reference, and its relationship to acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that deceleration does not exist as a distinct entity, arguing it is simply acceleration in the opposite direction.
  • Others propose defining deceleration as a decrease in speed, noting that this can be confusing when changing frames of reference.
  • A participant raises a thought experiment about distinguishing between acceleration and deceleration while in a moving car, questioning the perceptual differences.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that deceleration is a relative term, implying that its meaning can vary based on context.
  • One participant compares the term deceleration to the concept of cold, suggesting that while it may lack scientific precision, it is widely understood and useful in everyday language.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the term deceleration. Multiple competing views remain regarding its definition and usefulness in physics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the definitions of acceleration and deceleration, particularly concerning frame of reference and the subjective nature of speed perception.

tim_lou
Messages
682
Reaction score
1
as my high school physics teacher stressed, deceleration does not exist. it was a forbidden word in my introductory physics class.

I do indeed partly agree with my teacher. Since if deceleration is a vector quantity, it would be very confusing since deceleration sort of implies the "negative" of acceleration. In that case, deceleration can simply be replaced by an acceleration vector in the opposite direction.

perhaps it would make more sense to define deceleration as the decrease of the speed. just like how molecule decelerate when their temperature decrease. However, it is still confusing when one switch frame of reference, where the decrease in speed in one frame can be an increase in speed in another.

well... the discussion of deceleration is indeed quite silly... but what are your thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine yourself sitting in a car with your eyes closed. Can you tell the difference between moving forward with increasing speed ("accelerating"), and moving backward with decreasing speed ("decelerating")?
 
If you have a frame of reference for speed / kinetic energy, then I would define acceleration as the one that increases velocity / kinetic energy, and deceleration as the one that decreases speed / kinetic energy.
 
I guess technically deceleration does not exist as an entity in itself, but it is just a descriptive word. As was stated, deceleration is just acceleration in the opposite direction. What happens when you finally reach a velocity of 0 and start accelerating in the opposite direction of where you were originally going? Your acceleration/deceleration has not changed; surely you are not decelerating anymore, but you have been accelerating in the same direction the entire time.

However, I believe most people understand the concept of deceleration so it is silly to forbid its use:smile: . It's like forbidding the use of the word cold: There is no such thing as scientific cold; it is just a lack of heat, but everyone knows what cold describes.
--
Need homework help?
http://www.wholikeshomework.com"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deceleration is a relative term, that's all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K