Is Education Merely Imposing Professors' Beliefs on Learners?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of education as a mechanism for imposing professors' beliefs and practices onto learners. Participants argue that while education may seem to enforce conformity, it also serves to instill critical thinking and independent understanding. The conversation highlights the tension between traditional educational methods and the need for dynamic, evolving systems that accommodate new ideas. Ultimately, education is portrayed as a vital institution that builds upon the knowledge of previous generations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of educational theories and philosophies
  • Familiarity with critical thinking concepts
  • Knowledge of the dynamics of teacher-student relationships
  • Awareness of historical perspectives on education
NEXT STEPS
  • Research contemporary educational theories that promote critical thinking
  • Explore the role of dynamic systems in education
  • Examine case studies on the impact of professor-student interactions
  • Investigate historical shifts in educational practices and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Educators, students, educational theorists, and anyone interested in the evolution of teaching methodologies and the role of critical thinking in learning.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
At the base isn't education just imposing prof's beliefs and way of acting to learners ?

So it lasts only if learners copy, but everyone knows that the system is kidding and contradictory, so isn't education fragile ? That's why the profs control and eventually punish discrepancies between what was told or done and the supposed recopying by the learners.

Hence objectively there can be nothing new in this system ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Inevitably whoever you end up working with for a few years (if you're doing graduate study or employment as a postdoc) will rub off on you. How much depends on whether they are your superior, colleague or subordinate, your personalities and the compatibility of your views.

Apart from that I am not sure what you're asking in your post.
 
jk22 said:
At the base isn't education just imposing prof's beliefs and way of acting to learners ?
No. It's actually about imposing working beliefs and established way of acting to learners, so they can avoid the very ineffective way of finding them on their own.

jk22 said:
Hence objectively there can be nothing new in this system ?

At which level of the education system do you think some new can/should be found?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
jk22 said:
At the base isn't education just imposing prof's beliefs and way of acting to learners ?
Not if the students learn and practice independent critical thinking.

I once outraged a professor during an elective seminar covering development of major religions by contradicting his statement beginning "Scientists believe..." by stating that science does not require a learner to believe (in this context where belief implies faith) but to understand.
jk22 said:
Hence objectively there can be nothing new in this system ?
Lability, such as copying a professor or any authority figure, does not constitute a system. Dynamic systems by definition, change; accommodating the new.
 
jk22 said:
At the base isn't education just imposing prof's beliefs and way of acting to learners ?

Suppose she herself is well taught and understands much: why do you pose it as an indictment?

Education is what humans do so each generation doesn't have to start from scratch. It is the finest of institutions . See farther...shoulders of giants...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
44K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K