Is energy always conserved in a co-rotating frame?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phantomvommand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Frame
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Energy conservation in a co-rotating or accelerating frame is contingent upon the specifics of the frame's rotation and acceleration. To determine energy conservation, one must calculate the Lagrangian of the system using generalized coordinates relevant to the non-inertial frame. If the Lagrangian is not explicitly time-dependent, the Hamiltonian is conserved, allowing it to be interpreted as the system's energy. For uniformly rotating frames, a specific form of energy conservation applies, which can be expressed mathematically as the total time derivative of the kinetic energy minus a term involving the moment of inertia and angular velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian dynamics
  • Knowledge of non-inertial reference frames
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian in non-inertial frames
  • Explore Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications
  • Research coordinate transformations between inertial and non-inertial frames
  • Examine energy conservation laws in rotating systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and students studying dynamics in non-inertial reference frames will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the implications of energy conservation in rotating systems.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Is energy always conserved in a co-rotating/accelerating frame?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a bit too unspecific. How is your frame rotating? The way to check "energy conservation" is to calculate the Lagrangian of the system in terms of the generalized coordinates parametrizing the in this case non-inertial frame. If the Lagrangian is not explicitly time-dependent then the associated Hamiltonian is conserved and you could with some right of analogy call the Hamiltonian the energy of the system.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and phantomvommand
As @vanhees71 said, there is insufficient detail to answer the question. You would have to describe accurately the rotation/acceleration in question. You could do that either with a coordinate transform between an inertial frame and yours, or with the metric or Lagrangian written directly in your frame's coordinates.
 
As I think I wrote in one of your previous threads, there is a simple form of energy conservation that applies to uniformly rotating, non-translationally-accelerating frames, viz: ##\dfrac{d}{dt} \left( T - \frac{1}{2}I \Omega^2 \right) - \displaystyle{\sum_a} \mathbf{F}_a \cdot \mathbf{v}_a = 0##. If all of the ##\mathbf{F}_a## are conservative then ##\displaystyle{\sum_a} \mathbf{F}_a \cdot \mathbf{v}_a## is a total time derivative and you have a conserved energy.

For other systems, whether or not you can find energy integrals depends on whether there is time dependence in the lagrangian i.e. write ##H = \dot{q}^i \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}^i} - L## then if ##\partial L/\partial t=0## you have$$\dfrac{dH}{dt} = \dot{q}^i \dfrac{d}{dt} \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}^i} + \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}^i} \ddot{q}^i - \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial q^i} \dot{q}^i - \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}^i} \ddot{q}^i$$which equals zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K