Discussion Overview
The discussion centers on the perceived prestige and differences between Engineering Technology and traditional Engineering degrees, particularly in the context of manufacturing engineering technology. Participants explore the implications of these differences on career prospects, academic rigor, and accreditation.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants assert that Engineering Technology graduates do not hold the same prestige as Engineering graduates, suggesting that Engineering Technicians typically engage in more hands-on lab work compared to Engineers who focus on research.
- There is a viewpoint that the term "technology" in a degree title may carry negative connotations, implying a less rigorous academic experience, although this can vary by institution.
- One participant notes that the rigor of an Engineering Technology program is closely tied to its course offerings and whether it is ABET accredited, which is seen as a marker of quality.
- A participant shares a link to their program's structure, highlighting that some classes have different names but cover similar content to traditional engineering courses, raising questions about the equivalency of the degrees.
- Some participants express that the program described seems similar to a traditional engineering degree, while others caution about the lack of ABET accreditation and its potential impact on future employment and licensure as a Professional Engineer (PE).
- Concerns are raised about the implications of attending a non-ABET accredited program, including the inability to become a licensed engineer and potential employer skepticism regarding the program's academic integrity.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the prestige of Engineering Technology versus Engineering degrees. There are competing views on the implications of program structure and accreditation, with some expressing confidence in the quality of the discussed program while others emphasize the importance of ABET accreditation.
Contextual Notes
Participants note that the evaluation of the program's rigor and its impact on career opportunities depends on various factors, including course content, institutional reputation, and accreditation status. There is also uncertainty regarding the specific requirements for becoming a licensed engineer based on program accreditation.