Is Every Metric Space Regular?

Click For Summary
Every metric space is regular, satisfying the T1 and T3 axioms. The T1 property is established by showing that for any two distinct points, there exist neighborhoods that do not contain each other. For T3, it is demonstrated that for a closed subset and a point outside it, disjoint neighborhoods can be constructed. Various attempts to prove these properties highlight the importance of careful selection of neighborhoods and the relationship between distance and closure. The discussion emphasizes the need for rigorous justification in proofs related to metric spaces.
radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,148
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



To prove that every metric space is regular. :)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, a regular space satisfies the T1 and T3-axioms.

For T1: Let a, b be two distinct points of a metric space (X, d). Then d(a, b) > 0, and let r = d(a, b)/2. Then the open ball K(a, r) is a neighborhood of a which doesn't contain b, and K(b, r) is a neighborhood of b which doesn't contain a.

For T3: Let A be a closed subset of X, and let b be in X\A. Since we proved that T1 holds, for every x in A and for b there exists a neighborhood of Ux which doesn't contain b. A is a subset of the union U of these neighborhoods (U is a neighborhood of A). Now, define r = min{d(x, b)/2: x is in A}. Then K(b, r) and U are disjoint.

I hope this works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably should justify why r in your second argument is non-zero.

Also, your U is picked too generally. Knowing that singletons are closed, we could have picked U to be everything except for b, which obviously wouldn't work. You need to pick the balls surrounding the points in A more carefully
 
Last edited:
OK, here are three other attempts.

i) T3: Let r = d(A, b) = inf{d(a, b) : a is in A}, where b is in X\A. Since A is closed, Cl(A) = A, and d(A, b) = 0 if and only if b is in the closure of A (i.e. in A), which contradicts our assumption, so d(A, b) > 0. Take r = d(A, b)/2, and take the union U of the family of open balls {K(x, r) : x is in A}. Then U and K(b, r) are disjoint.

ii) Since every metric space is Haussdorf (one can easily show this in a similar manner like showing that it is T1), for every x in A, and for b in X\A, we can find disjoint neighborhoods of x and b respectively, Ux and Vx. The intersection of all Vx and the union of all Ux are disjoint neighborhoods of A and b, respectively.

iii) Since every metric space is normal (i.e. it's T1 and T4), it's regular, too (since, for every two disjoint closed sets one can find disjoint neighborhoods of these sets, and a singleton is closed in a metric space). Of course, this proof assumes that normality is proven :)
 
Your argument (i) suffices, assuming you can take it as known that d(b, A) = 0 if and only if b \in \overline{A}.
 
ystael said:
Your argument (i) suffices, assuming you can take it as known that d(b, A) = 0 if and only if b \in \overline{A}.

Yes, I went through the proof of that argument, it was part of another assignment. Thanks.
 
radou said:
ii) Since every metric space is Haussdorf (one can easily show this in a similar manner like showing that it is T1), for every x in A, and for b in X\A, we can find disjoint neighborhoods of x and b respectively, Ux and Vx. The intersection of all Vx and the union of all Ux are disjoint neighborhoods of A and b, respectively.

You don't know know that an intersection of open sets is open when there are infinite of them.
 
Office_Shredder said:
You don't know know that an intersection of open sets is open when there are infinite of them.

Good point, thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K