High School Can Forces be Used to Derive the Equation for a Rocket?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Newton's second law, particularly in variable mass systems like rockets. It establishes that when mass changes over time, as in the case of a rocket expelling fuel, the force equation must account for both the external forces and the momentum loss due to the expelled mass. The correct formulation is given by the equation m*a = F_ext + \dot{m}(\Delta v), where F_ext is the external force, \dot{m} is the rate of mass change, and \Delta v is the difference in velocities. The discussion emphasizes the importance of conservation of momentum in deriving the rocket equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law and its implications.
  • Familiarity with the concept of momentum and its conservation.
  • Knowledge of variable mass systems, particularly in the context of rockets.
  • Basic calculus for differentiating equations involving mass and velocity.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the rocket equation using conservation of momentum.
  • Learn about variable mass systems in classical mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of external forces in dynamic systems.
  • Investigate the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in non-constant mass scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rocket propulsion and variable mass systems.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
Regarding Newton's second law, are we allowed to consider cases where the mass ##m## changes with time?

I see ##F = m dv/dt## so frequently that I found myself asking this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kent davidge said:
Regarding Newton's second law, are we allowed to consider cases where the mass ##m## changes with time?

I see ##F = m dv/dt## so frequently that I found myself asking this question.
Can you give an example of how the mass is changing with time?
 
Chestermiller said:
Can you give an example of how the mass is changing with time?
Perhaps a rocket expelling fuel?
 
The better definition of force is in terms of momentum
$$
\vec F = \frac{d\vec p}{dt}.
$$
For a variable mass system where ##m## is a function of ##t##, you need to be careful though. Just applying the definition
$$
\vec F = \frac{d(m\vec v)}{dt} = \dot m \vec v + m \vec a
$$
without considering what goes into ##\vec F## can lead you astray and the equation is not Galilei invariant (##\vec v## depends on the inertial frame). In order to get it right, you must consider both external forces that act upon the system as well as the loss of momentum due to the mass leaving. If the mass leaving does so with velocity ##\vec u##, the force equation becomes
$$
\vec F_{\rm ext} + \dot m \vec u = \dot m \vec v + m \vec a,
$$
where ##\vec F_{\rm ext}## is the external force acting on the system, which can be rewritten as
$$
m\vec a = \vec F_{\rm ext} + \dot m (\vec u - \vec v) = \vec F_{\rm ext} + \dot m \Delta \vec v,
$$
where ##\Delta\vec v## is the difference between the velocity of the exhaust and that of your object, i.e., the exhaust velocity relative to the object, which is Galilei invariant as it is the difference of two velocities.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge and Delta2
kent davidge said:
I see ##F = m dv/dt## so frequently that I found myself asking this question.
That's the apppropriate simplification to ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## when the mass is a constant. You see it so often because it because so many interesting and important problems involve a constant mass. The reader is expected to recognize it as the constant-mass special case without further reminders.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Newton's Second Law says that "For a particle, F = m*a." By definition, a particle has constant mass and zero dimensions.
 
The only way I was able to derive the equation for a rocket was to first (temporarily) assume that the external force is zero, and then to apply conservation of momentum. At time t, the momentum of the rocket/fuel plus the momentum of the discharged gas is given by:
$$m(t)\mathbf{v}(t)-\int_0^t{\dot{m}(t')\mathbf{u}(t')dt'}=\mathbf{C}$$
where m(t) is the mass of rocket+fuel at time t, ##\mathbf{v}## is the velocity of the rocket+fuel, ##\dot{m}=dm/dt##, and ##\mathbf{u}##is the velocity of the discharge gas. If I differentiate this equation with respect to t, I obtain:
$$m\mathbf{a}+\dot{m}\mathbf{v}-\dot{m}\mathbf{u}=0$$
or $$m\mathbf{a}=\dot{m}(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})$$

Is there another alternate derivation that is easy to make sense of.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
As ChesterMiller said, The only way I was able to derive the equation for a rocket was to first (temporarily) assume that the external force is zero, and then to apply conservation of momentum.

That is exactly the correct way to get the rocket equation, with the exception that there is nothing temporary about the external force being zero.
 
Dr.D said:
As ChesterMiller said, The only way I was able to derive the equation for a rocket was to first (temporarily) assume that the external force is zero, and then to apply conservation of momentum.

That is exactly the correct way to get the rocket equation, with the exception that there is nothing temporary about the external force being zero.
I was thinking that the external force might be gravity, for example.
 
  • #10
Dr.D said:
Newton's Second Law says that "For a particle, F = m*a."

No, it says F=dp/dt. There is no limitation to particles in the second law.

http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-ADV-B-00039-00001/46

Chestermiller said:
The only way I was able to derive the equation for a rocket was to first (temporarily) assume that the external force is zero, and then to apply conservation of momentum.

And you can do that using forces because they imply conservation of momentum (due to the 3rd law).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K