Is f(x) =1, 0<= x <= 1, and f(x) = 2, 1<x<=2 Riemann Integrable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icantadd
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f defined as f(x) = 1 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and f(x) = 2 for 1 < x ≤ 2 is Riemann integrable on the interval [0, 2]. To demonstrate this, one must show that the lower integral equals the upper integral. The approach involves partitioning the interval into three segments: [0, 1-1/n], [1-1/n, 1+1/n], and [1+1/n, 2]. As n approaches infinity, the upper and lower sums converge, confirming the integrability of f and leading to the integral value of 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrability criteria
  • Familiarity with lower and upper sums in integration
  • Knowledge of partitioning intervals for integration
  • Concept of monotonic functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Riemann integrable functions
  • Learn about partition refinement techniques in integration
  • Explore the concept of monotonicity in functions and its implications for integrability
  • Review the algebra of integrals and its applications in solving integrals with discontinuities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying real analysis, particularly those focusing on integration techniques and Riemann integrability.

icantadd
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f:[a,b] -> R where f(x) =1, 0<= x <= 1, and f(x) = 2, 1<x<=2. Show f is riemann integrable on [0,2], and compute integral.



Homework Equations


A function f, bounded on an interval [a,b] is riemann integrable iff the lower integral equals the upper integral.
Lower integral is the sup of the lower sum, upper integral the inf of the upper sums.

lower sum is denoted L(p,f); upper U(p,f).

f is r. integrable iff for every e >0 there is a partition P such that U(p,f) - L(p,f) <= e.

What would be really nice is to break this into two integrals, one from o to 1, the other from 1 to 2. However, we "don't know this yet". This question is in a section of the book before the "algebra of integrals" is discussed. We also have not discussed riemann sums yet, and I so I don't think I can mark my partition.

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so because this function is constant except for a jump at some x_k in [0,2], what I want to do is isolate this point and handle it on its own. So I just call it x_k.

Next, is obvious that the only place that the lower integral will differ from the upper integral will be about x_k. Part of me also wants to just call x_k 1, but then I don't get the nice coherent notation for writing out my partition. So here let P be a partition of [0,2] such that there are an even number of partitions, and the partitions split around 1 = x_k very nicely.

I get that the lower integral equals x_n - x_(k+1) equals 2 - 1 = 1. And I stop. This is obviously wrong. The integral should be 3, so I know I am wrong. Can anyone help me out on this one?


Oh yeah, here is another solution I started working on. Because f is constant most of the time, I can say that f is monotonic. In fact, trivially, I can say that it is increasing if I take increasing to mean >=. Then I have a theorem that if f is monotonic, f is riemann integrable. I just don't know how to deal with the jump. Or does it not matter.

Thank you PF.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Break your interval into three intervals: from 0 to 1-1/n, from 1-1/n to 1+ 1/n, and from 1+ 1/n to 2. In the first interval, the "upper" and "lower" sums are the same: 1 times the length- and as n goes to infinity, the length goes to 1. In the third integral, the "upper" and "lower" sums are the same: 2 times the length- and as n goes to infinity, the length goes to 1. For the middle interval, the "upper" sum is 2 times the length while the "lower" length is 1 times the length- but the length goes to 0.

Any partition can "refined" so that no intervals overlap two of those three.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K