Is Gravity a function of mass or density

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of gravity in relation to mass and density, particularly in the context of black holes. Participants explore how gravity behaves as a star collapses into a black hole and the implications of this collapse on the understanding of gravity itself.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that gravity is a function of mass, asserting that more mass results in stronger gravitational force.
  • Another participant argues that the total gravity of a black hole does not increase, and that the strength of gravity felt at a distance remains unchanged before and after a star collapses into a black hole.
  • Concerns are raised about the size of black holes, with one participant questioning whether they are indeed small compared to the stars that create them.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the event horizon and the Schwarzschild radius, with participants noting that black holes can have very small radii.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between the whirlpool of matter around a black hole and the black hole itself, suggesting that gravity may not increase as a black hole forms.
  • A question is posed about how gravity can escape from a black hole, with references to quantum theories and the behavior of virtual particles.
  • Another participant presents a viewpoint that black holes may not contain material inside, proposing that matter is transformed into energy or dark energy within a black hole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether gravity is a function of mass or density, and there is no consensus on how gravity behaves in relation to black holes. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of gravity's escape from black holes and the internal structure of black holes.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of gravity, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics and the nature of black holes. There are unresolved questions about the transformation of matter and energy within black holes.

curiouschris
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I know I have a very simplistic understanding of gravity. but nonetheless I was contemplating black holes when an anomaly struck me.

Gravity (strength of) in my simplistic terms...
Gravity is a function of mass the more mass (matter) the stronger the force called gravity.

Creation of a black hole as I understand it...
A star at least 3 times greater than ours explodes into a supernova it then collapses back onto itself under its own gravitational influence. no longer supported by its nuclear reactions it continues to collapse eventually crushing the matter inside it to a super dense object. the gravity from this object is so strong even light cannot escape it.

Oooh I just thought of something else. but I digress.

Back to the original train wreck of thought...

Where does the "extra" gravity come from?

Surely the strength of the gravity is the same before and after the collapse. There is approximately the same amount of matter. Only its density has changed.
(I imagine a little got sucked back in from the surrounds if there was anything nearby. At the same time I imagine an amount was ejected never to return).

Does this mean that gravity is actually a function of density?
In other words as the density increases so does the strength of the gravity.

My digression is about the nature of gravity. If gravity is a wave and it travels in waves at the speed of light then how can gravity itself escape a black hole?

Personally I don't think gravity is a wave, though a perturbation in the field can travel as a wave at the speed of light.

I haven't asked this in cosmology as I felt except for the reference to black holes this is more of a general physics question.

CC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The total gravity of the black hole does not increase. If you were a given distance from a black hole before and after it forms you would not feel any difference in gravity.

However, gravity does increase as you get closer to the object's center as long as you don't go below its surface. When a black hole shrinks, its surface becomes closer to its center. This allows you to get a lot closer to its center without ever hitting its surface.

With a black hole, the original mass has shrunk so small that you can get so close to its center that you reach a point where the gravity is strong enough to stop even light from escaping.
 
Thanks Janus

If that's the case which I did surmise. but seemed to be at odds to what I know of black holes.

Then black hole in a celestial sense must be tiny. The event horizon must be a lot smaller in diameter than the original star that created it. I thought or perhaps assumed black holes were huge objects consuming whole galaxies and the odd battle cruiser.

Instead are they mere kilometers or even meters across?

CC
 
Oh cool I have just found a link that bears out this discussion

http://www.universetoday.com/39861/schwarzschild-radius/

If you could compress the Sun down to a radius of 2.5 km, it would be come a black hole. For the Earth, that radius is 0.9 cm. And a large mountain might be smaller than a nanometer. That radius is called the Schwarzschild Radius.
Of course I realize their is supermassive ones as well. I guess they are the ones that filled my imagination.

CC
 
I think you're confusing the whirpool of matter that gets sucked into a black hole (which can be very large) with the black hole itself, which in classical theory has no size at all but is a singularity of infinite density. You might also be thinking about the radius of the event horizon, which can range from a few millimeters to many thousands of kilometers.

Edit: I guess you realized that. The Schwarzschild Radius is the radius of the event horizon.
 
My thoughts were that the "whirlpool" of matter sucked into the black hole would be the same whirlpool of matter sucked into the star before it became the black hole.

As Janus explained for a given distance from the star the pull of gravity does not change as the sun descends into black holeness.

That was what I had suspected was true, if gravity was mass reliant rather than density reliant.

What I had believed prior was that for some reason the gravity increased as a black hole formed. sucking more and more of the neighbourhood in and therefore continuing to grow.

Anyone willing to respond to the question about how does gravity escape from a black hole? I know it seems a silly question. but if gravity follows similar laws to light then surely it could not escape either.
 
curiouschris said:
Anyone willing to respond to the question about how does gravity escape from a black hole? I know it seems a silly question. but if gravity follows similar laws to light then surely it could not escape either.

That exact question was actually addressed on NASA's "ask an astrophysicist" FAQ page.

In a quantum point of view, though, it's a good question. We don't yet have a good quantum theory of gravity, and it's risky to predict what such a theory will look like. But we do have a good theory of quantum electrodynamics, so let's ask the same question for a charged black hole: how can a such an object attract or repel other charged objects if photons can't escape from the event horizon?

The key point is that electromagnetic interactions (and gravity, if quantum gravity ends up looking like quantum electrodynamics) are mediated by the exchange of *virtual* particles. This allows a standard loophole: virtual particles can pretty much "do" whatever they like, including traveling faster than light, so long as they disappear before they violate the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980601a.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dear friends, I made my point of view under the black hole I think that there is no material inside. Because as powerful as gravity, the composition of material in all elementary particles are transformed into (conversion why I do not know, but I guess the energy or dark energy). As we all know, has a particle nature of light, when the photons into the black hole itself, they have all been transformed since been transformed, there is no light escape from the black hole problem. This can explain why black hole absorbing all the material, and high-energy rays eruption.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K