Is Gravity Caused by Non-Linear Time Dilation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the hypothesis that non-linear time dilation around massive bodies may be the cause of gravity, rather than gravity being a result of mass. Participants explore alternative formulations of relativity, the implications of time dilation, and experimental observations related to gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that non-linear time dilation leads to a distortion in a particle's shape, causing its center of mass to move towards a gravitational source, resulting in free fall.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about separating time dilation from space contraction in a viable theory.
  • A participant mentions having published work related to this hypothesis.
  • Some participants reference historical figures and suggest that the topic of time in relativity deserves more discussion, citing ignored contributions from physicists like Prokhovnik and Selleri.
  • One participant shares extensive experimental work with an electrical circuit that reportedly changes weight, suggesting that current theories of gravity may need significant revisions.
  • Another participant outlines axioms of modern physics regarding gravity, questioning their validity and proposing that electromagnetic structure, rather than mass, could be responsible for gravitational effects.
  • Data is presented showing that Lorentz transformations can match gravitational velocities, suggesting a possible alternative mechanism for gravity through non-linear time dilation.
  • There is a suggestion that gravity might be a virtual field, with real effects stemming from non-linear time dilation surrounding massive bodies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the exploration of non-linear time dilation as a cause of gravity, while others challenge the feasibility of separating time dilation from space contraction. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on unproven assumptions about the nature of mass and gravity, and there are unresolved questions regarding the experimental methods and interpretations presented by participants.

  • #31
I'm moving my theory to The Gravity Theory

Still under theorydevelopment. It's now even more simple.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Non-Inertial Relativistic Dynamics
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Undergrad Confused about time dilation -- motion vs energy
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Graduate Special Relativity in Rotating Reference frame
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
High School What Is the Proper Time of the CMB and Its Implications?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Undergrad Gravitational Field Transformations Under Boosted Velocity
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
High School Difference between special relativity and redshift?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Undergrad How time dilation is a permanent change and length contraction not?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
High School What Causes Mass to Exert Gravitational Pull?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Escape Velocity, Gravitational Velocity & Time Dilation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Undergrad What about the Big Ben Paradox?
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K