Is Gravity Emergent? Answers to Pre-Big Bang Questions

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emergent Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between gravity and mass, particularly in the context of pre-Big Bang theories. Participants assert that gravity can exist independently of mass, as it is influenced by factors such as radiation and the Cosmological Constant. The question of whether gravity or mass came first is deemed ambiguous and poorly defined, leading to the closure of the thread for lack of valid references and clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and its implications on gravity.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of mass and spacetime curvature.
  • Knowledge of the Cosmological Constant and its role in cosmology.
  • Ability to differentiate between valid scientific questions and personal speculation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of general relativity on the nature of gravity.
  • Study the role of the Cosmological Constant in modern cosmology.
  • Examine the relationship between radiation and gravitational effects.
  • Explore the philosophical implications of pre-Big Bang conditions in cosmology.
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, physicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the foundational concepts of gravity and mass in the universe's early stages.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
I thing by my logic that gravity must have been at the pre bang stage, but then what did came first gravity or mass?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
Space news on Phys.org
The egg came first. Definitely, the egg...
 
wolram said:
I thing by my logic that gravity must have been at the pre bang stage, but then what did came first gravity or mass?
Gravity curves spacetime. It doesn't require that mass exists. Mass is one possible source of gravity, others are e.g. radiation or the Cosmological Constant.
So from this it seems the question "what did came first gravity or mass?" doesn't make sense.
 
wolram said:
I thing by my logic that gravity must have been at the pre bang stage

Personal speculations are not allowed here. Discussions should be based on valid references, not your "logic".

wolram said:
what did came first gravity or mass?

This question is not well-defined since both "gravity" and "mass" are ambiguous terms. I suggest that you consult some references and start a new thread with a better defined question that has a better basis. This thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
551
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K